Skip to main content
TRANSFER APPL

Mr. Tasleem Rashid Qureshi +1 moreVsMr. Bimal Agarwal

CNR MHCC01001202201819-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 03rd May 2018

TrustJury record updated 08 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100016/2018
Registration Date
22 Jan 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Tasleem Rashid Qureshi
    2. 2Mr. Anees Rashid Qureshi And Anr - Dindoshi Suit No. 2576 Of 2012

    Respondent

    1. 1Mr. Bimal Agarwal

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 23-01-2018
Business: Adv. Ajay Bharadwaj for applicant present.
Adjd. to 05/02/2018 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 05-02-2018

Date: 05-02-2018
Business: Adv. A.N. Shaikh for applicant present.
At the request of Ld. Counsel for applicant, adjd. to 17/02/2018 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2018

Date: 17-02-2018
Business: Adv. Ajay Bharadwaj for applicant present.
At his request adjd. to 27/02/2018 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2018

Date: 27-02-2018
Business: Adv. Ajay Bharadwaj for applicant present.
He seeks further time for service.
Adjd. to 15/03/2018 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2018

Date: 15-03-2018
Business: Adv. Ajay Bharadwaj for applicant present.
He files affidavit of service.
None present for respondent.
Adjd. to 03/04/2018 for reply/hearing.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2018

Date: 03-04-2018
Business: Adv. Snehal Masay for applicant present.
None for respondent.
Note - Court is on leave today.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2018

Date: 17-04-2018
Business: None present for the parties.
Application to proceed without reply.
Adjd. to 03/05/2018 for hearing.
Later on.
Adv. Snehal Masewar for applicant present.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2018

Date: 03-05-2018
Business: None present for the parties.
Kept back.
Later on.
None present. However, on perusal of application, it appears that both the suits are between the same parties relating to the same properties. Hence in order to avoid inconsistent decisions by two different Courts, I allow the application in terms of prayer clause (a).
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 03-05-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101306/2018
Filing Date: 22-01-2018
First Hearing Date: 23rd January 2018
Decision Date: 03rd May 2018
Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    03 May 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 03/05/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA
T.A. 16/18 None present for the parties.
Kept back.
Later on.
None present. However, on perusal of application, it appears that both
the suits are between the same parties relating to the same properties.
Hence in order to avoid inconsistent decisions by two different Courts,
I allow the application in terms of prayer clause (a).
Principal Judge,
Gr. Mumbai.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    03 May 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 03/05/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA
T.A. 16/18 None present for the parties.
Kept back.
Later on.
None present. However, on perusal of application, it appears that both
the suits are between the same parties relating to the same properties.
Hence in order to avoid inconsistent decisions by two different Courts,
I allow the application in terms of prayer clause (a).
Principal Judge,
Gr. Mumbai.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.