Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01001184201904 Apr 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 04 Apr 2019 · CNR MHCC010011842019

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 1
IN THE BOMABY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
Transfer Application No.39 of 2019
In
S.C. Suit No.582 of 2016
Smt.Jayshree Balkirshna Chavan ..Plaintiff
V/s.
Smt.Yashoda Tanaji Chavan
& Ors. ..Defendants
And
S.C. Suit No.912 of 2016
Mrs.Shubhangi V. Nikte
& anr. ..Plaintiffs
V/s.
Nitin Jivaji Ingle & anr. ..Defendants
Coram : H.H.THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
SHRI V.G. BISHT
Dated : 4th April,2019
(C.R.No.19)
Advocate Mr.Sandeep Ghogre for applicant (defendant no.3 in Suit
No.582/16 and defendant no.1 in suit no.912/16).
Advocate Mr.Heramb Kadam for respondent nos.4 and 5.
O R A L O R D E R
Read application. Read reply and rejoinder.
-- 1 of 4 --
2
2 The present application is filed by the applicantoriginal
defendant no.3 in Suit No.582/16 (pending in C.R. No.4) and defendant
no.1 in Suit No.912/16 (pending in C.R. no.3) to club both the matters
and try together.
3 It appears that the plaintiff has filed suit no.582/16 for
declaration and share in respect of flat no.703, Amrutvel CHS Ltd., Ganesh
Galli, Lalbaug whereas filed suit no.912/16 for partition and share in
respect of same flat. It further appears that initially both suits were
assigned in same court, however, later Suit No.582/16 was transferred to
C.R. No.4. Hence, the present application.
4 Mr.Sandeep Ghogre, learned counsel for the applicant,
submitted that since the subject matter in both the suit is same, the suit be
tried together.
5 Mr.Heramb Kadam, learned counsel for respondent nos.4 and
5 submitted that the present application is taken out by a person who is
defendant in both the suits and hence the present application is not
maintainable as no harm is going to be caused to the present applicant.
The prayers in both the suits are different and hence prayed for dismissal.
6 Earlier the suits were in one court. It is desirable, having
regards to facts of both suits, that both the suit be tried by one court. No
prejudice would be caused to respondents. Therefore, application merits
-- 2 of 4 --
3
consideration and deserves to be allowed.
7 In view of above, I pass the following order:
O R D E R
Transfer Application No.39 of 2019 is allowed.
Suit No.916/2016 pending in C.R. No.3 stands
transferred to C.R. No.4 for disposal in accordance with law.
Both the courts be informed accordingly.
04/04/2019 (V. G. BISHT)
Principal Judge,
Gr.Bombay.
Dictated on : 04/04/2019
Transcribed on : 04/04/2019
Signed by HHJ on : 04/04/2019
-- 3 of 4 --
4
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER
Name of Stenographer: Mrs.Aruna S. Jayade
Upload date and time: 04/04/2019 (5.30 p.m.)
Name of the Judge H.H.THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Shri V.G. BISHT(C.R.No.19)
Date of Pronouncement of Order 4th April,2019
Order signed by P.O. on 4th April,2019
Order uploaded on 4th April,2019,2019
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.