Manohar Khandu Karbal Summ.Suit No. 2378 of 2013VsHarsha Tukaram Jadhav

Date: 01-02-2019
Business: Shri. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Patil states that warrant of attachment u/o. XXI Rule 48 of CPC, has been issued dt.22/07/2015 and he further states that the defendant has now retired and therefore, prays for issue of warrant u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC. Shri. Patil undertakes to inform this office about the payment received so far in compliance of the warrant u/o. XXI Rule 48 of CPC. Hence, issue warrant u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC returnable on 26/04/2019.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2019

Date: 26-04-2019
Business: Parties and Advocates absent. Record shows that the warrants u/o.XXI Rule 48 and 46 in the matter have been issued on 22/07/2015 and 07/02/2019 respectively.  In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrants issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrants till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrants of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 26-04-2019

Filing Number: 101235/2019
Filing Date: 11-06-2015
First Hearing Date: 01st February 2019
Decision Date: 26th April 2019
Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI