TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026
Date: 12-03-2019 Business: Adv. for plaintiff present. Adv. for defendant present. Exh- 9 Adv. for plaintiff filed application for substitution of the authorized representative of the plaintiff company. Adv. for defendant filed original NM Nos. 449/19 and 378/19. t.o.r. Adjd for taking steps to 10/06/2019. Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2019 Date: 10-06-2019 Reason For Adjournment: court time is over Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2019 Date: 23-08-2019 Business: Representative of plaintiff Mr. Shukla is present. Adv. Nupur Jalan along with Adv. Anukul Seth for defendant No. 2,3 and 4 present. Representative of plaintiff states that the adv. for plaintiff will not come today. Adv. for plaintiff to remain present on next date for argument of Nm No. 449/19 and NM No. 387/19 Adjd for NM for hearing to 17/09/2019. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2019 Date: 17-09-2019 Business: Court is on leave Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2019 Date: 14-11-2019 Business: Representative of plaintiff present. Adv. Jitesh Agarwal for plaintiff present. Adv. Nupur Jalan for defendant No. 2 and 4 present. Adjd for NM hearing to 21/01/2020 Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2020 Date: 21-01-2020 Business: Adv. for defendant present and stated that she will not be able to remain present in afternoon session. Adv. Jitesh Agarwal for plaintiff present. Adv. for plaintiff filed vakalatnama on behalf of plaintiff. t.o.r. Adv. Nupur Jalan along with Adv. A. B. Seth for defendant No. 2 to 4 present and stated that the plaintiff is killing time by prolonging the hearing of NM though reply is filed. Plaintiff is directed to argue Nm on next date failing which NM will be heard and decided without arguments of Plaintiff. Adjd for NM arguments to 04/03/2020. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2020 Date: 04-03-2020 Business: Adv. for defendant nos.3 and 4 present. F.R.S.R. following Order is passed in NM 449 of 2019 O r d e r 1.The Notice of Motion No.449 of 2019 is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the Plaintiff to be paid within one month from the date of the order. 2.On payment of the above costs within the above period, the delay of 5 days is condoned to seek leave to defend the Summons for Judgment. 3.Accordingly, Notice of Motion No.449 of 2019 is disposed of. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 04-03-2020
Filing Number: 100955/2019 Filing Date: 30-01-2019 First Hearing Date: 12th March 2019 Decision Date: 04th March 2020 Court Number And Judge: 13-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM.No.449/2019 : 1 : Summary Suit No.416/2017 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 449 OF 2019 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 288 OF 2018 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 416 OF 2017 CNR NO. MHCC01-001134-2019 1. Mr. Rahul Tantia 2. Ashok Kumar Surana .. Applicants/Defendant Nos.3 and 4. In the matter between: M/s Time Technoplast Ltd. V E R S U S 1. M/s Tantia Agrochemicals Pvt. Ltd.,…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
