Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Harishchandra Ramnath YadavVsMCGM +2 more

CNR MHCC01001102202012-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 24th March 2021

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100318/2020
Registration Date
29 Jan 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1Harishchandra Ramnath Yadav

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM
    2. 2Slum Rehabilitation Authority
    3. 3Siddheshwar Construction Company

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 34 · 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 26-03-2020
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2020

Date: 18-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 08-05-2020

Date: 08-05-2020
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2020

Date: 29-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2020

Date: 16-06-2020
Business: national lock down
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 13-10-2020

Date: 13-10-2020
Business: Due to lockdown because of Covid-19, board is discharged and as per SOP only urgent matters are taken up.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2021

Date: 01-02-2021
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Chandramore for the defendant No.1.
Adv. Mr. Trivedi for the defendant No.2.
No reply has been filed to Ch/s. Hence, Ch/s be kept for hearing.
Matter is adjd. to 24/03/2021 for Ch/s hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 24-03-2021

Date: 24-03-2021
Business: Plaintiff is present.
Adv. Sanjay Prabhu for plaintiff.
Adv. Trivedi for defendant No.2.
The ld. advocate for the plaintiff submits that the suit premises has been demolished and therefore, no cause of action survives. So, the suit may be disposed of.
    In view of the submission of the ld. advocate for the plaintiff, the suit is disposed of. As the main suit is disposed of, NM No.489/2020 and Ch/s No. 245/2020 do not survive. Accordingly, NM No.489/2020 and Ch/s No. 245/2020  are disposed of. Proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 24-03-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101303/2020
Filing Date: 28-01-2020
First Hearing Date: 26th March 2020
Decision Date: 24th March 2021
Court Number And Judge: 12-COURT 12  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    24 Mar 2021
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0100318/2020
Harishchandra Ramnath Yadav Vs MCGM
Date : 24-03-2021
Plaintiff is present. Adv. Sanjay Prabhu for plaintiff. Adv. Trivedi for defendant No.2.
The ld. advocate for the plaintiff submits that the suit premises has been demolished
and therefore, no cause of action survives. So, the suit may be disposed of. In view of
the submission of the ld. advocate for the plaintiff, the suit is disposed of. As the main
suit is disposed of, NM No.489/2020 and Ch/s No. 245/2020 do not survive.
Accordingly, NM No.489/2020 and Ch/s No. 245/2020 are disposed of. Proceeding is
closed.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.