Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Vyankatesh Yallappa Kunchikorve Summ. Suit 341 of 2016VsParvin Sakaram Kamble

CNR MHCC010010562019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 23rd August 2019

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100420/2017
Registration Date
26 Sept 2017

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 06-02-2019
    Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Patil has tendered original and duplicate warrant u/o. XXI Rule 48 of CPC, dt. 10/11/2017, without its execution. Shri. Patil has also tendered chamber order alongwith affidavit in support of the same for amendment in column (J) in execution application and for issue of warrant of salary attachment on amended address by amending the warrant of attachment tendered today. Affidavit in support of chamber order marked as Exh. 04. Upon perusing the affidavit and upon hearing of Shri. Patil, Chamber Order signed separately. Amendment be carried out as per Chamber Order and amended warrant be issued returnable on 29/04/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2019
    
    Date: 18-04-2019
    Business: Shri B.S.Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Matter is taken on board by way of praceipe, taken on board and marked as Exh.05. On request of Shri. Patil, time to carry out amendment is extended till 15/06/2019 and amended warrant be issued returnable on 23/08/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2019
    
    Date: 23-08-2019
    Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Patil states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 30/04/2019 appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 23-08-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101147/2019
    Filing Date: 26-09-2017
    First Hearing Date: 06th February 2019
    Decision Date: 23rd August 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.