Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Sunkappa Gurappa JadhavVsVINOD ANANT KONDKAR

CNR MHCC010009802019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 24th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100020/2019
Registration Date
24 Jan 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-02-2019
    Business: Shri.  Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present. As court is on leave, board discharged, matter is adjourned to 06/02/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2019
    
    Date: 06-02-2019
    Business: Plaintiff present. Advocate absent. On request of plaintiff, adjourned to 12/02/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2019
    
    Date: 12-02-2019
    Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  Shri. Jain  prays for issue of Warrant u/o.XXI, Rule 48 of CPC, against the defendant, without issue of notice, stating that the Execution Application is filed within two years of passing of Decree.  Hence, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 14/06/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 14-06-2019
    
    Date: 14-06-2019
    Business: Shri. Ramesh  Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff Present. On request of Shri. Jain, for taking instructions in respect of receipt of payment in the Office of Sheriff of Mumbai in compliance of warrant of attachment u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC,  adjd to 25/09/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2019
    
    Date: 25-09-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent. As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 24/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 24-10-2019
    
    Date: 24-10-2019
    Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Jain states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 13/02/2019, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 24-10-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 101043/2019
    Filing Date: 24-01-2019
    First Hearing Date: 04th February 2019
    Decision Date: 24th October 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.