Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01000953201927 Sept 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 27 Sept 2019 · CNR MHCC010009532019

Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement
Pdf Text: 1 Sum. Suit 285 of 2019
Received on : 23.01.2019
Registered on : 13.02.2019
Decided on : 27.09.2019
Duration : Y M D
0 7 14
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 285 of 2019
CNR NO.: MHCC010009532019
Mr. Mangesh Nagurao Gadge
of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant,
aged 29 years, Occupation carrying
on Money Lending Business, in the name
of Mr. Mangesh Nagurao Gadge
underlicense No. RBE990 and having
his residence and office address at
Kohinoor City, Coop. Housing
Society Ltd., Building No. 6,
3rd Floor, Flat No. 634, Kurla (W),
Mumbai – 70 ...Plaintiff
Versus
Mr. Amol Suresh Bhise
of Chembur West Mumbai an adult
Indian Inhabitant, Aged about 29 years,
Occupation : Service, residing at
Room No. 2, Sahakar Seva Sangh,
Mukund Nagar, P.L. Lokhande Marg,
Chembur West, Mumbai – 400 089.
And also having his office address at
Municipal Corporation of greater Mumbai
-- 1 of 5 --
2 Sum. Suit 285 of 2019
B.M.C. office, department Saffsafai
Khatte/ Consy. Employee Code No. 4413996,
Ps.A 6027, S.G. Barve Marg, Kurla (W),
Mumbai 400 076. ….Defendant
Appearances:
Advocate Mr. Balbheem Patil for the Plaintiff.
Defendants Exparte.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI.M.S.LONE
(C.R.NO.28)
DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER 2019
J U D G M E N T
This is a suit for recovery of Rs.10,40,000/(Rupees Ten Lacs
Forty Thousand only).
2. Plaintiff case in nut shell is that on 07/05/2017 defendant
executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for valuable
consideration of Rs.8,00,000/ the defendant also promised to pay
interest @ 18% per annum on the said amount. On 16/04/2018
plaintiff demanded the said amount but defendant refused to pay.
Defendant is in default of Rs.10,40,000/(Rupees Ten Lacs Forty
Thousand only). Hence, this suit.
3. The defendant was served with summons for appearance but he
remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against him.
4. From the material on record following points come for my
determination and my findings with reasons are as follows:
-- 2 of 5 --
3 Sum. Suit 285 of 2019
POINTS FINDINGS
1. Whether plaintiff proves that
defendant executed promissory
note for valuable consideration?
Yes
2. Whether plaintiff proves that
amount of Rs.10,40,000/(Rupees
Ten Lacs Forty Thousand only) is
due and recoverable from
defendants?
Yes
3. Whether plaintiff is entitled for
recovery of Rs.10,40,000/
(Rupees Ten Lacs Forty Thousand
only) with interest as claimed?
Yes
4. What order and decree? As per final order
REASONS
AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4.
5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To
prove its case plaintiff examined himself vide Exh.7 and filed original
promissory note and notice of demand.
6. Heard Learned counsel for plaintiff.
7. The affidavit is supported by documents. The original promissory
note and advocates demand notice shows that on 07/05/2017
defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for
valuable consideration of Rs.8,00,000/ the defendant also promised to
pay interest @ 18% p.a. on the said amount. On 16/04/2018 plaintiff
demanded the said amount but defendant refused to pay. Defendant is
in default of Rs.10,40,000/(Rupees Ten Lacs Forty Thousand only). As
far as rate of interest is concerned plaintiff has prayed for rate of 18%
p.a. The said rate of interest is mentioned in Promissory Note and hence
-- 3 of 5 --
4 Sum. Suit 285 of 2019
it is granted. Therefore, point No.1 to 3 is answer as 'Yes' and following
order is passed.
ORDER
1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs.
2. Defendant do pay to the plaintiff the amount of
Rs.10,40,000/(Rupees Ten Lacs Forty Thousand only) with
interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till full and
final realization.
3. Court fee be refunded as per rules.
4. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
(M.S.LONE)
Judge,
Date: 27/09/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay
Dictated on : 27/09/2019
Transcribed on : 27/09/2019
Signed on : 30/09/2019
-- 4 of 5 --
5 Sum. Suit 285 of 2019
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGEMENT/ORDER”
UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
03/10/2019 12.35 p.m. Prachi Y. Potdar (H.G.)
Name of the Judge HHJ Shri. M.S.Lone
(C.R.NO.28)
Date of Pronouncement of
Judgment/Order.
27/09/2019
Judgment/order signed by P.O on 30/09/2019
Judgment/order uploaded on 03/10/2019
-- 5 of 5 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.