EXECUTION APPLN
Kailash Basant KediaVsNeeta Bhupendra Parikh
CNR MHCC010009372020966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 16th February 2023
TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100077/2020
- Registration Date
- 23 Jan 2020
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 10-02-2020 Business: Shri. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff Present. On request of Shri. Jain, for taking further steps, adjd to 11/02/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2020 Date: 11-02-2020 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Jain prays for issue of warrant u/o XXI Rule 43 of CPC, without issue of notice stating that the Exe. Application is filed within two years of passing Decree. Shri Jain states that the property sought to be attached is free from all the encumbrances and belongs to defendant. In view of this issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 28/04/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2020 Date: 28-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 19-05-2020 Date: 19-05-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2020 Date: 06-06-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2020 Date: 24-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2020 Date: 13-08-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2020 Date: 30-09-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2020 Date: 25-11-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2021 Date: 29-01-2021 Business: Parties and advocate are absent adjourned to 19/04/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2021 Date: 19-04-2021 Business: Parties and advocate are absent. Matter adjourned to 12/07/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 12-07-2021 Date: 12-07-2021 Business: In view of directions vide Office Order No.131 of 2021, matter adjourned to 22/09/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 22-09-2021 Date: 22-09-2021 Business: Shri Ramsh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain, adjourned to 29/11/2021, by extending the returnable date of warrant. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2021 Date: 29-11-2021 Business: As Court is on leave, board discharged and matter adjourned to 15/01/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2022 Date: 15-01-2022 Business: In view of Office Order No.07 of 2022, matter adjourned to 03/03/2022, earlier orders to continue. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 03-03-2022 Date: 03-03-2022 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain, awaiting inventory in matter adjourned to 28/04/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2022 Date: 28-04-2022 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Exe.application marked as Exh.A(Colly.). Shri Jain, has tendered amendment application t.o.r and marked as Exh.B. Upon hearing Shri Jain, amendment application allowed. Amendment be carried out as per rules and amended warrant after carrying out amendment, be issued returnable on 18/07/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2022 Date: 18-07-2022 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain advocate for plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain time to carry out amendement is extended by 14 days from today and warrant after amendment be issued returnable on 21/09/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2022 Date: 21-09-2022 Business: As Court is on leave, board discharged and matter adjourned to 05/11/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 05-11-2022 Date: 05-11-2022 Business: As Court is on leave, board discharged and matter adjourned to 29/11/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2022 Date: 29-11-2022 Business: Parties and advocate absent. Amendment has not yet been carried out as order on 28/04/2022, and extended on 18/07/2022 and hence matter adjourned for dismissal to 22/12/2022. Next Purpose: DISMISSAL Next Hearing Date: 22-12-2022 Date: 22-12-2022 Business: Parties advocates absent. Though the matter is kept for dismissal none appeared today also and hence, execution application stands disposed of as dismissed. Matter mentioned at 3.45 p.m. by Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff. Shri Jain prays for setting aside the order of dismissal passed in the matter during regular time of Board. Record shows that despite granting adjournment to carry out amendment, no amendment carried out and hence, matter was kept on board today under caption for dismissal and accordingly came to be dismissed. Shri Jain now earnestly prays for setting aside the dismissal order, stating that amendment will be carried out on or before 15/01/2023. Considering his request, dismissal order passed today during regular Board time, is set aside. Time to carry out amendment is extended till 15/01/2023, subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/- to State of Maharashtra, to be paid before carrying out amendment. Warrant after amendment is made returnable on 16/02/2023. Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2023 Date: 16-02-2023 Business: Parties and advocate absent. Matter was dismissed on 22/12/2022 and on the same day it was ordered to be restored at the instance of advocate for plaintiff, subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/- and came to be adjourned to 16/02/2023. However, record shows that the cost awarded for restoration of execution application has not been paid till date and hence, order of dismissal stands and accordingly execution application stands disposed of as dismissed. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 16-02-2023
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100938/2020 Filing Date: 23-01-2020 First Hearing Date: 10th February 2020 Decision Date: 16th February 2023 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
1Final Order 116 Feb 2023
16 Feb 2023
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Back Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI Case No. :EXECUTION APPLN/0100077/2020 Kailash Basant Kedia Vs Neeta Bhupendra Parikh Date : 16-02-2023 Business : Parties and advocate absent. Matter was dismissed on 22/12/2022 and on the same day it was ordered to be restored at the instance of advocate for plaintiff, subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/- and came to be adjourned to 16/02/2023. However, record shows that the cost awarded for restoration of execution application has not been paid till date and hence, order of dismissal stands and accordingly execution application stands disposed of as dismissed. Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED Disposal Date : 16-02-2023 IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI Print -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
