Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 11 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010009282020
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 134 OF 2020 IN SUIT NO. 3076 OF 2011 (CNR NO. MHCC01-000928-2020) UCC Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. )...Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: Unique Constructions Corproation )...Plaintiff. Versus Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation )...Defendant. Appearance:- Ld.Advocate Mr.Rajat Dedia for Plaintiff. Ld.Advocate Mr.Bharat Gadavi for Defendant. CORAM: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. R.V.KOKARE (C.R.No.31) DATE: 11/02/2020. O R D E R This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for making amendment in the plaint. The defendant resisted this chamber summons by filing its reply. Read the present chamber summons, affidavit of Ashok Gyanchand Khushalani on behalf of the plaintiff in support of chamber summons. Heard both the learned counsels on behalf of both the sides. Perused the record. 2. The learned counsel for the plaintiff argued that, on scrutiny of the proposed amendment which is mentioned in this chamber summons in schedule, it appears that the nature of the suit will not be changed. Moreover, it will not cause any hardship to the -- 1 of 3 -- 2 defendants. The learned counsel on behlaf of the defendants has submitted that the present suit is filed on behalf of plaintiff in the year 2011 and this chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff in the month of January 2020. There is around 9 years after filing the suit the plaintiff wants to make an amendment in the plaint. Therefore, if this court is come to the conclusion for allowing this chamber summons, then cost may be imposed. On close scrutiny of proposed amendment, it appears to me that, if proposed amendment is to be allowed, then it will not change nature of the suit. Advocate for the plaintiff is agreed to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/-. If this chamber summons of the plaintiff is to be allowed subject to cost of Rs. 5,000/-, then it will not cause any hardship on the part of the defendants and imposing cost of Rs.5,000/- is justiable. Hence, I proceed to pass following order. ORDER 1. Plaintiff’s chamber summons no.134/2020 is hereby allowed as prayed for subject to costs of Rs.5,000/-. 2. Plaintiff and its advocate are hereby directed to carry out proposed amendment as prayed within stipulated period. 3. The plaintiff shall deposit cost amount of Rs.5,000/- on or before 18/02/2020 to the DLSA, Mumbai. 4. Chamber summons no.134/2020 is disposed off accordingly. Date :11/02/2020. (R.V.Kokare) Judge, City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 11/02/2020 Transcribed on : 13/02/2020 Signed by HHJ : 13/02/2020 -- 2 of 3 -- 3 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGEMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 13/02/2020 5.00p.m. Mrs. V.V.Malgaonkar Name of the Judge HHJ Shri R.V.Kokare(CR No.31) Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/ Order 11/02/2020 Judgment/order signed by P.O on 13/02/2020 Judgment/order uploaded on 13/02/2020 -- 3 of 3 --
