Full Order Text
Order 2 · 09 Dec 2020 · CNR MHCC010008442018
Order Details: Order below exhibit Pdf Text: MHCC010008442018 CNR NO. MHCC010008442018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI ORDER BELOW EXH.18 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 527 OF 2017 IN SUIT NO.2266 OF 1994 Shri Tulshiram Shivaji Sonawane ] (Deleted Since Deceased) through ] his Legal Heirs ] 1. Ramesh T. Sonawane & Four Ors. ]...Applicants/ Org. Plaintiff. V/s. Girjappa Raoji Hotkar ] (Deleted Since Deceased) ] through his Legal Heirs ] 1. Smt. Sulochana G. Hotkar & Anr. ]...Respondents Org. Defendants. Appearance: Advocate Mr. Ravindra Singh for the Applicant. Advocate Mr. Yash Joglekar for the plaintiff. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR (C.R.No.20) DATE : 9th DECEMBER, 2020. -- 1 of 7 -- - 2 - O.B.EXH.18 in Execution Appln.527-2017 ORAL ORDER 1. The applicant / Original plaintiff filed this application for grant of police protection. 2. In brief, it is contention of the applicants/ Original plaintiff that the said Execution is filed for execution of Judgment and Decree dated 20.08.2016. The said Judgment and decree is confirmed by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court as per the order dated 19.04.2018 and the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as per order dated 31.08.2018. This Court has passed order and directed to issue warrant of possession against defendants to execute decree. On 23.01.2020 bailiff had been to the spot to execute decree by warrant of possession but defendants resisted and did not hand over possession of the suit premises. Therefore, grant Police protection from Local police station i.e. Shahunagar Police Station, Dharavi, Mumbai – 400 017 to help the bailiff to execute warrant of possession and to hand over possession of the suit premises as per the decree. 3. I have heard the Learned Advocate appearing for the original plaintiff. Perused record. Judgment Debtor / defendants had filed an application Exh.15 on 28.11.2019 for adjournment. The said application is rejected on the same date by hearing both the parties and by passing detailed order. 4. Perused Order passed below Exh.01 dated 28.11.2019. As per the said order it is directed to issue writ of possession under -- 2 of 7 -- - 3 - O.B.EXH.18 in Execution Appln.527-2017 Order 21 Rule 35 of C.P.C. on required process fee to hand over possession of the suit premises to the plaintiffs as per decree passed dated 20.08.2016 in S.C. Suit No.2266/2004. 5. One Applicant Mrs. Shubhangi Raju Hotkar had filed Chamber Summons No.199 of 2020 to record the obstruction caused by her and to pass appropriate order restraining the decree holder from disturbing the possession of the applicant in respect of the premises being Tennary No.21, situated at Palkar Chawl, Dharavi Cross Road, Dharavi, Mumbai – 400 017 save and except by following due process of law. After hearing both the sides, the said Chamber Summons is disposed of by order dated 18.02.2020. The said Chamber Summons is rejected. The Operative Order of the Said Chamber Summons runs as under: “ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No. 199 of 2020 is rejected. 2. At this stage Ld Adv for applicant states that this order be stayed for a one week as applicant want to challenge this order. The Ld Adv for plaintiff states that this order can not be stayed. I am opinion that the C/s is rejected, therefore there is no question of granting stay. Hence, oral prayer for granting stay of this order is rejected. ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) Dt.: 18/02/2020 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI” -- 3 of 7 -- - 4 - O.B.EXH.18 in Execution Appln.527-2017 6. The instant application Exh.18 was filed on 18.02.2020. After hearing plaintiffs advocate application Exh.18 was posted for order on 09.03.2020. On 09.03.2020 the Learned Advocate for applicant Mrs. Shubhangi Hotkar filed application Exh.18 for adjournment contending that the applicant preferred the Writ Petition No.1796 of 2020 against the order passed in Chamber Summons No.199 of 2020 dated 18.02.2020 in the Hon'ble High Court. He had submitted on 09.03.2020 before the Court that applicant Shubhangi Hotkar is going to press for stay before the Hon'ble High Court on 13.03.2020. Thereafter, matter adjourned for order on the present application Exh.18 on 18.03.2020. Thereafter, time to time matter adjourned because of Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. 7. As per contention raised in the Chamber Summons 199 of 2020 applicant therein Shubhangi Raju Hotkar came with case that she is in possession of the suit premises and therefore to restrain the Decree Holder from disturbing her possession in any manner. As per detailed order passed in the said Chamber Summons the contention of the applicant Mr. Shubhangi Hotkar is not accepted to restrain the Decree Holder as prayed. 8. Para No.8 of Order passed in Chamber Summon No.199 of 2020 dated 18.02.2020 runs as under: “ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No. 199 of 2020 is rejected. 2. At this stage Ld Adv for applicant states that this order be stayed for a one week as applicant want to challenge this order. The Ld Adv for plaintiff states that this order can not be stayed. I am opinion that -- 4 of 7 -- - 5 - O.B.EXH.18 in Execution Appln.527-2017 the C/s is rejected, therefore there is no question of granting stay. Hence, oral prayer for granting stay of this order is rejected. ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) Dt.: 18/02/2020 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI 9. Perused copy of the bailiff report dated 23.01.2020 which is annexed with this application Exh.18. The concerned bailiff mentioned therein that he had been to the suit premises to execute decree by handing over the possession of the suit premises to the plaintiff on 23.23.2020 at 10.30 a.m. He went there with plaintiff No.1 Ramesh Tulsiram Sonawane. One Smt. Sulochana Girjappa Hotkar i.e. defendant No.1 was at the suit premises. Defendant No.2 Raoji Girijappa Hotkar was not present. Smt.Sulochana Girijappa Hotkar i.e. defendant No.1 refused to vacate the suit premises. Therefore, he could not execute writ of possession. 10. Perused para No.14 of Order passed in Chamber Summon No.199 of 2020 dated 18.02.2020. It runs as under: “14 The said S.C. Suit No.2266 of 2004 is disposed of by Judgment dated 20.08.2016. The Operative Order passed in the said S.C. Suit No.2266 of 2004 runs as under: ORDER 1. Suit is decreed with cost. 2. Defendants are hereby directed to hand over vacant possession of the suit premises to the plaintiff within one month from the date of this order. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. Dated 20/08/2006 Judge” -- 5 of 7 -- - 6 - O.B.EXH.18 in Execution Appln.527-2017 11. Perused Section 151 of C.P.C. Inherent powers under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure can be used to execute the decree to hand over the possession of the suit premises to plaintiff by granting police protection. Hence following Hence following order: ORDER Application Ex.18 for grant of police protection is allowed as under- 1. Shahu Nagar police station at Dharavi, Mumbai 400017 is hereby directed to provide required police personnels as per rule to the bailiff to execute decree passed in Suit No. 2266 of 2004 as per judgment dated 20-08-2016 to hand over possession of the suit premisses i.e. Tannary No. 21 situated at Palkar Chawl, Dharavi Cross road, Dharavi, Mumbai 400017 to the plaintiffs. 2. Issue fresh writ of possession under Order 21 Rule 35 of C.P.C. on required process fee to handover possession of the suit premises to the plaintiffs as per decree passed dated 20-08-2016 in S.C.Suit No. 2266 of 2004. ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) Dt.: 09/12/2020 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI Dictated on : 09/12/2020. Transcribed on : 17/12/2020. Draft given on : 17/12/2020 Checked on : 18/12/2020 Signed on : 18/12/2020. ( SHANKAR G. BORLEPWAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 6 of 7 -- - 7 - O.B.EXH.18 in Execution Appln.527-2017 “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 18.12.2020 at 05.12 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (VARSHA U. PAWAR) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge HHJ SHRI S. G. BORLEPWAR (COURT ROOM NO.20) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 09.12.2020 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 18.12.2020 Judgment/order uploaded on 18.12.2020 -- 7 of 7 --
