Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Priyesh BhedaVsGoogel India Pvt Ltd and Anr.

CNR MHCC01000794202013-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 22nd December 2020

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100107/2020
Registration Date
18 Jan 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 07-03-2020
    Business: Adv. Ms. Akshita Bhargava I/b M. Mulla Associates filed undertaking to file vakalatnama on next date on behalf of defendant No. 1 and 3. t.o.r.
    Adv. Radha Kapadia filed undertaking to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondents in CS No. 107/2020.
    Plaintiff in person is present.
    Adjd for compliance to 04/04/2020.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 04-04-2020
    
    Date: 04-04-2020
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2020
    
    Date: 27-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-05-2020
    
    Date: 18-05-2020
    Business: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2020
    
    Date: 05-06-2020
    Business: National lockdown
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2020
    
    Date: 23-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2020
    
    Date: 18-09-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2020
    
    Date: 12-10-2020
    Business: Plaintiff in person is present.
    Exh- 3 Adv. Vedant Desai I/b Mulla and Mulla filed vakalatnama on behalf of defendant No. 1. t.o.r.
    Plaintiff in person filed two affidavit of services of suit No. 2766/19. t.o.r.
    Plaintiff filed two affidavit of services of Chamber summons No. 4772/19. t.o.r.
    Plaintiff in person requested for ad interim relief in notice of motion in respect of publication of news of plaintiff in Google in the year 2008. The chamber summons is pending for appearance of proposed defendant DNA. Plaintiff today filed affidavit of service. Plaintiff stated that in Notice of motion he wants DNA to be party. Plaintiff wants urgent hearing of application in that respect plaintiff to communicate the next date to the proposed defendant as plaintiff stated that he received letter from advocate for proposed defendant i.e. M/s Dua and Associates. Plaintiff stated that after receipt of that letter he served personally the copy of plaint to advocate for proposed defendant.
    Adv. for defendant No. 1 is seeking time to file reply to notice of motion. As plaintiff stated that there is urgency, the defendant No. 1 to file reply.
    Adjd for appearance of proposed defendant/reply of defendant No. 1 to 07/11/2020.
    Later on
    Adv. Radha Kapadia for proposed defendant in chamber summons is present.
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2020
    
    Date: 07-11-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2020
    
    Date: 01-12-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 22-12-2020
    
    Date: 22-12-2020
    Business: Adv. Deeshank Doshi for respondent present.
    Adv. Ms. Anuja Jhunjhunwala I/b M Mulla Associates.for Respondent no. 1 to 3 present.
    Plaintiff in person present at 11.05 pm. And insisted  to pass ex-parted order against the respondent as they  are not  appearing .  On last date also they appeared in the morning but did not appear in the afternoon. The Plff. was told that as per SOP which is  to be strictly followed adverse orders can not be passed against the parties absent. To that  the Plaintiff in person stated  that he has to withdraw the suit  as the suit is not proceed.
    Adv. for Respondent present.
    He stated that he has senior has told to file reply to the chamber summons No.107/2020 .
    The copy is received by Plaintiff in person.
    K.B. in afternoon as hearing cases are to  be heard in afternoon.
    Later on.
    Report submitted by Sheristedar.
    Heard Adv. Deeshank Doshi for respondent  and  plaintiff in person.
    Sheristedar point out that the affidavit in support of Ch/Sum. is not on record. The Plaintiff did not file that affidavit for re-construct The Plaintiff stated that he will file it today.
    Adv. Doshi for proposed defendant stated that the contents of chamber summons and affidavit submitted by plaintiff is same.
    The copy submitted by plaintiff for reconstruction is accepted.
    F.R.S.R. Following order is passed in Ch/s No.107/2020.
    	 ORDER
    1.Chamber Summons No. 107 of 2020 is allowed.
    2.The proposed defendant is added as defendant no. 4 in the suit.
    3.The plaintiff is directed to carry out the amendment within limitation.
    4.Accordingly Chamber Summons is disposed of.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 22-12-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100866/2020
    Filing Date: 18-01-2020
    First Hearing Date: 07th March 2020
    Decision Date: 22nd December 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 13-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    22 Dec 2020

    Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 Ch/Sum. No. 107/2020 in S.C. Suit 2766/2019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 107 OF 2020 IN SUIT NO. 2766 OF 2019 Priyesh Bheda, I R S ...Plaintiff Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ....Defendants CORAM : Smt. S.S.Nagur Judge (C.R.NO.13) DATE :22nd December 2020 APPEARANCE Plaintiff in person present. Adv. Doshi for defendants present. ORDER 1. The Chamber Summons is filed by the Plaintiff to implead…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.