Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Subhash Ramsharan Sharma - Execution No.105 of 2001 - Suit No.6460 of 1992VsBabu - Baburam Rajaji Yadav +1 more

CNR MHCC0100079120198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 15th September 2021

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100320/2019
Registration Date
22 Jan 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 29-01-2019
    Business: None present for plff.
    Adjd to 12/03/2019 for service.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2019
    
    Date: 12-03-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Ankita Upadhyay I/b Adv. Sonali Dahotre for Applicant present and tendered original Ch/s No.385/19 alongwith affidavit.
    Adv. Mr. Vikas Singh for Plff present.
    Adv. Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh for Deft No.1 present.
    Adv. Mrs. Vyavhare for MCGM/deft No.2 present.
    Order
    Heard both sides at length on the point of grant of status quo directing Deft/judgment debtor and his family members not to create third party interest in the suit premises. Ld. Adv. for Deft No.1 strongly opposes the prayer stating that the decree is already executed and there are no four rooms forming part of the suit premises as alleged by DH.  However, this is an earlier stage of hearing.  No harm will be caused it status quo is granted. Therefore both parties to maintain status quo and they should not create any third party interest in the suit premises till next date.
    Adjd to 15/4/2019 for hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2019
    
    Date: 15-04-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Vikas Singh for original Plff/applicant present and tendered reply to Ch/s No.385/19.  Copy be served to otherside.
    Adv. Ms. Chaitali Chaudhary for Resp. No.1 present.
    Adv Mrs. Bhoir for MCGM/Resp No.2 present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjd to 26/6/2019 for Ch/s hearing.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 26-06-2019
    
    Date: 26-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Vikas Singh for DH present.
    Adv. Chaitali Choudhary for JD no. 1 present.
    Adv. Khandagle for JD. No. 2/MCGM present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjd to 02.08.2019 for Ch/s hearing.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2019
    
    Date: 02-08-2019
    Business: (Incharge Court of C.R.No.8)
    Adv. V.K. Singh for Plaintiff present.
    None for Defendant.
    Earlier order, to continue, till next date.
    Adjd. to 09.09.2019 for Ch/s. hearing.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2019
    
    Date: 09-09-2019
    Business: None for D.H. and JD No.1.
    Adv. Mr. S.C. Khandagale for JD.no.2/MCGM present.
    None for applicant.
    L.O.
    Adv. Vikas Singh for DH present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjd to 16/10/2019 for C/S hearing/ Dismissal.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2019
    
    Date: 16-10-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2019
    
    Date: 15-11-2019
    Business: None for DH.
    Adv. Mrs. D.D. Patil for JD No. 2/MCGM present.
    Adv. Sheth for JD No. 1.
    Adv. Ankita Upadhyay for applicant present.
    Applicant present.
    KB
    LO
    heard applicant and JD No. 1\''s Advs. On c/s No. 385/19.
    Adjd to 16-12-2019  for C/S Hearing (Argument of DH)
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2019
    
    Date: 16-12-2019
    Business: Adv. Vikas Singh for D/H present.
    Adv. Mr. S.C. Khandagale for  J/D. NO. 2/MCGM present.
    Adv. Ankita Upadhyay  for applicant present.
    KB
    Heard both sides in C/S
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjd to- 18-12-2019  for C/S Order  .
    Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 18-12-2019
    
    Date: 18-12-2019
    Business: None for D.H..
    Applicant is present.
    None for J.D.No. 1.
    Adv. Mrs. D.D. Patil for J.D. No. 2/MCGM present.
    KB LO
    Order on C/S No. 385/19 -
    Perused C/S, reply filed thereto and heard both sides. By this C/S the applicant has claimed that his structure admeasuring 110 sq.ft. at survey no. 24 was attached in execution of warrant of attachment dated 01-10-2001 without there being any order of attachment thereof and he has prayed to raise the said warrant of attachment and to restore possession thereof to him. After going through the history of this case, the court receiver took possession of the above structure from the applicant on 22-09-2017 after contempt petition was filed against his father before Hon\''ble Bombay High Court. Moreover, the decree in LC Suit no. 6460/1992 is very clear and not only JD No. 1 but also his family members were directed to remove their articles form the suit premises shown in red colour in the sketch annexed to the plaint therein. Therefore, the subsequent changes in the said room can not be given any importance. For the reasons stated above C/S is devoid of merits and it is rejected.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjd to 20-01-2020  for N/M service and reply .
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2020
    
    Date: 20-01-2020
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    None for JD 1present.
    Adv. Khandagle for MCGM J/D -2 present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Matter adjd to 06.03.2020 for reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2020
    
    Date: 06-03-2020
    Business: Adv.Vikas Singh for Applicant/plaintiff present.
    None for defendant No.1.
    Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft.No.2 present.
    No reply against both the defendants.
    It is stated by Adv. Khandagale corporation is formal party.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
     Matter adjd to 13.04.2020 for NM-320/19 hrg.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 13-04-2020
    
    Date: 13-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2020
    
    Date: 28-04-2020
    Business: National lock down - 4
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2020
    
    Date: 06-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2020
    
    Date: 24-06-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2020
    
    Date: 27-07-2020
    Business: Adjd to
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2020
    
    Date: 28-09-2020
    Business: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2020
    
    Date: 06-11-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2020
    
    Date: 09-12-2020
    Business: None for plaintiff/applicant.
    None for deft no.1.
    Adv. Khandagale for deft no.2/MCGM present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Matter adjd to 17/02/2021 NM Reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2021
    
    Date: 17-02-2021
    Business: As court is on leave today, board is discharged.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2021
    
    Date: 05-03-2021
    Business: Adv. Vikash Singh for plaintiff present.
    None for deft no.1.
    Adv. Khandagle for deft no.2/MCGM present.
    Adv. for plaintiff submitted that despite of service of deft no.1, none present from deft no.1. Hence NM No.320/19 is proceeded without reply against deft no.1 only.
    Adv. for plaintiff submitted that as the Corporation is the formal party. We are not pressing anything against Corporation. Suit No.6460/92 which was filed against the deft no.2 (BMC) was withdrawn by the plaintiff and therefore contesting party is deft no.1 only. Therefore, matter is adjourned for argument on NM No.320/19.
    Matter adjd to 19/04/2021 for Hearing on NM No.320/19.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 19-04-2021
    
    Date: 19-04-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 02-07-2021
    
    Date: 02-07-2021
    Business: Due to Covid-19 pandemic, matter is adjourned.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2021
    
    Date: 11-08-2021
    Business: Adv. Vikash Singh for applicant / plaintiff present.
    None for JD/ defendant no.1
    Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for JD/ original Defendant no.2/MCGM is present.
    Heard both sides on NM NO.320/19.
    Adjd. To 13/08/2021 for order on NM NO.320/19.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2021
    
    Date: 13-08-2021
    Business: Adv. Mr. Siddhesh Sharma nephew of applicant/original plaintiff present. Applicant/original plaintiff  and his advocate is absent.
    None for JD/ defendant no.1
    Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for JD/ original Defendant no.2/MCGM is present.
    The defendant no.1(J/D-1) and his advocate absent. Therefore, matter is adjourned for the argument of defendant no.1. If on the next date, defendant no.1(J/D -1) fail to argue the matter, further order will be passed.
    Adjd. To 04/09/2021 for argument of defendant no.1 in N/m/ order on NM NO.320/19.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2021
    
    Date: 04-09-2021
    Business: Adv Vikas Singh for applicant / original plaintiff present.
    None for respondent no.1.
    None for respondent no.2/ MCGM.
    Heard advocate for applicant / original plaintiff in NM NO.320/2019
    Adjd. To 07/09/2021 for order on NM No.320/2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2021
    
    Date: 07-09-2021
    Business: Adv Vikas Singh for applicant / original plaintiff present.
    None for respondent no.1.
    None for respondent no.2/ MCGM.
    Adjd. To 15/09/2021 for order on NM No.320/2019.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 15-09-2021
    
    Date: 15-09-2021
    Business: Adv Vikas Singh for applicant / original plaintiff present.
    None for respondent no.1/ original defendant no.1.
    None for respondent no.2/ original defendant no.2/ MCGM.
    F.R.S.R. Following order is passed on NM NO.320/2019-
    ORDER
    1. Prayer clause (b) in N/M. No.320/2019 is granted till decision of Execution Application No.105/2001.
    2. Notice of Motion No.320/2019 is disposed off accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 15-09-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100947/2019
    Filing Date: 22-01-2019
    First Hearing Date: 29th January 2019
    Decision Date: 15th September 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 2
    15 Sept 2021
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
    Pdf Text: 15/09/2021
    E.A.
    NO.105/2021
    in SU.6440/92
    CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI S.D. KULKARNI, (C.R.NO.08)
    Adv Vikas Singh for applicant / original plaintiff present.
    None for respondent no.1/ original defendant no.1.
    None for respondent no.2/ original defendant no.2/ MCGM.
    F.R.S.R. Following order is passed on NM NO.320/2019
    ORDER
    1. Prayer clause (b) in N/M. No.320/2019 is granted till decision of Execution
    Application No.105/2001.
    2. Notice of Motion No.320/2019 is disposed off accordingly.
    Adjd. To 08/10/2021 for hearing on Execution Application NO.105/2001.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Final Order 1Full order available
    15 Sept 2021

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM 320/2019 1 IN EXE.105/01 IN SU 6460/92 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT MUMBAI. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.320/2019 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2001 IN SUIT NO.6460 OF 1992 Subhash Ramsharan Sharma ]... Applicant / Original Plaintiff Versus Babu @ Baburam Rajaji Yadav & Anr. ]...Respondents/ Resp. No.1- Orig. Defendant Ld. Adv. Vikas Singh for the Applicant None for Resp. Orig. defendant No.1 None for Resp. Orig. defendant No.2…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.