Skip to main content
TRANSFER APPL

Surendra Jayantibhai TannaVsMCGM +1 more

CNR MHCC01000772201819-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 18th January 2018

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100008/2018
Registration Date
16 Jan 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-01-2018
    Business: Adv. Indira Bhushan for applicant present.
    Adv. Sanjay Sinha for respondent/defendant No.2 present.
    Heard Ld. Counsels for both the sides.
    Both the Counsel submit that the matter was finally argued by all the parties twice. Now the matter is placed for passing the Judgment. However, the matter is now once again transferred to C.R.No.5 where the parties are now once again required to argue the matter which has already been argued twice. In the above circumstances, it will be just and proper to transfer the matter to C.R.No.8 where the matter has been argued at length. Hence I pass following order.
    1.Suit No.500/2008 be withdrawn from C.R.No.5 and transferred to C.R.No.8.
    2.The application is accordingly disposed off.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 18-01-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100906/2018
    Filing Date: 16-01-2018
    First Hearing Date: 18th January 2018
    Decision Date: 18th January 2018
    Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    18 Jan 2018
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 18/01/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
    MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA
    T.A. 8/18 Adv. Indira Bhushan for applicant present.
    Adv. Sanjay Sinha for respondent/defendant No.2 present.
    Heard Ld. Counsels for both the sides.
    Both the Counsel submit that the matter was finally argued by all
    the parties twice. Now the matter is placed for passing the
    Judgment. However, the matter is now once again transferred to
    C.R.No.5 where the parties are now once again required to argue
    the matter which has already been argued twice. In the above
    circumstances, it will be just and proper to transfer the matter to
    C.R.No.8 where the matter has been argued at length. Hence I
    pass following order.
    1. Suit No.500/2008 be withdrawn from C.R.No.5 and
    transferred to C.R.No.8.
    2. The application is accordingly disposed off.
    Principal Judge,
    Gr. Mumbai.
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.