TRANSFER APPL
Surendra Jayantibhai TannaVsMCGM +1 more
CNR MHCC01000772201819-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 18th January 2018
TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100008/2018
- Registration Date
- 16 Jan 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
3Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 18-01-2018 Business: Adv. Indira Bhushan for applicant present. Adv. Sanjay Sinha for respondent/defendant No.2 present. Heard Ld. Counsels for both the sides. Both the Counsel submit that the matter was finally argued by all the parties twice. Now the matter is placed for passing the Judgment. However, the matter is now once again transferred to C.R.No.5 where the parties are now once again required to argue the matter which has already been argued twice. In the above circumstances, it will be just and proper to transfer the matter to C.R.No.8 where the matter has been argued at length. Hence I pass following order. 1.Suit No.500/2008 be withdrawn from C.R.No.5 and transferred to C.R.No.8. 2.The application is accordingly disposed off. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 18-01-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100906/2018 Filing Date: 16-01-2018 First Hearing Date: 18th January 2018 Decision Date: 18th January 2018 Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
Orders
1Final Order 118 Jan 2018
18 Jan 2018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 18/01/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA T.A. 8/18 Adv. Indira Bhushan for applicant present. Adv. Sanjay Sinha for respondent/defendant No.2 present. Heard Ld. Counsels for both the sides. Both the Counsel submit that the matter was finally argued by all the parties twice. Now the matter is placed for passing the Judgment. However, the matter is now once again transferred to C.R.No.5 where the parties are now once again required to argue the matter which has already been argued twice. In the above circumstances, it will be just and proper to transfer the matter to C.R.No.8 where the matter has been argued at length. Hence I pass following order. 1. Suit No.500/2008 be withdrawn from C.R.No.5 and transferred to C.R.No.8. 2. The application is accordingly disposed off. Principal Judge, Gr. Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
