Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

MAGNUM SILK MILLS PLVT. LTD.VsJAYAMERY J. MUDARIAL

CNR MHCC0100076020183-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISCHARGED
Decision Date: 19th November 2019

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100432/2017
Registration Date
05 Oct 2017

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 26-03-2018
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent.  As the warrant is already made returnable 11/10/2018, adjourned to 11/10/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2018
    
    Date: 01-10-2018
    Business: Wrongly on board.  Parties and Advocate absent.  Since, Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 11/10/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2018
    
    Date: 11-10-2018
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 15/11/2018.  Inventory report bearing No.VNKT/A-67241/285A/2018, dated 07/02/2018, under this office Inward No.1720, dated 09/02/2018, is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.4.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2018
    
    Date: 15-11-2018
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 09/01/2019. As nobody is appearing in the matter, issue letter to the Advocate for Applicant to appear before this Court, on next date, informing that on failure to appear before this Court on next date, matter will be disposed off, assuming that Decree/Order has been fully satisfied.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2019
    
    Date: 09-01-2019
    Business: Shri. M. R. Yadav, advocate for plaintiff present. Inventory Bearing No. VNKT/A-67241/285/2018, Dt. 07/02/2018 under this office inward no 1719, Dt. 09/02/2018, is taken on record and marked as Exh. 04. Shri. Yadav states that the defendant had taken out notice of motion for setting aside ex-parte decree and the stay granted in the said notice of motion is now vacated. Shri. Yadav therefore seeks time to take further step for issuance of warrant of sale and on his request adjourned to 16/01/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2019
    
    Date: 16-01-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to  29/01/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2019
    
    Date: 29-01-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to  26/02/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2019
    
    Date: 26-02-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 23/04/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2019
    
    Date: 23-04-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to  05/07/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 05-07-2019
    
    Date: 05-07-2019
    Business: Shri. M. R. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Shri. Yadav states that the Notice of Motion filed by the defendant, has been disposed off by the court, by passing conditional order, which has not been complied with by the defendant. He therefore, seeks time to file appropriate application with the copy of order passed in Notice of Motion and hence on his request, adjdj to 17/07/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 17-07-2019
    
    Date: 17-07-2019
    Business: Shri. M. R. Yadav, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Shri. Yadav seeks time to take further steps and on his request, adjd to 09/08/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 09-08-2019
    
    Date: 09-08-2019
    Business: Shri. N.D. Jaywant, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Shri. Jaywant, prays that present exe.application be referred to Court No.03, wherein Notice of Motion is for hearing on 27/08/2019. Hence, on request of Shri. Jaywant, present exe.application is hereby submitted to Court No.03 on 27/08/2019. Office to take steps to assign this matter to Court No.03. Parties and advocates to appear before the Court No.03 on 27/08/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2019
    
    Date: 27-08-2019
    Business: As the court is busy in dictating Judgement in NDPS Spl Case No.181 of 2014 and NM order in Suit No.1738/11 and 5290/12. Hence, board is discharged.
    Matter stands Adj to 1/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2019
    
    Date: 01-10-2019
    Business: Court is on leave
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2019
    
    Date: 19-11-2019
    Business: None present for D.H.
    Adv. Ms. Sunita Varma for J.D. Present.
    As per order dtd. 18.04.2019 in SU. No. 4314/11, NM no.4255/17 was allowed, subject to cost and on deposit of 50 percent of the amount of principal sum under the decree, which is sought to be executed. Thus, the decree under execution has been set aside and compliance has been made by the deft. therefore, execution proceeding do not survive. It is closed and E.A. disposed of.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISCHARGED
    Disposal Date: 19-11-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100807/2018
    Filing Date: 05-10-2017
    First Hearing Date: 26th March 2018
    Decision Date: 19th November 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    19 Nov 2019
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: Daily Status
    IN THE COURT OF :COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :EXECUTION APPLN/0100432/2017
    MAGNUM SILK MILLS PLVT. LTD. Vs JAYAMERY J. MUDARIAL
    Date : 19-11-2019
    Business : None present for D.H. Adv. Ms. Sunita Varma for J.D.
    Present. As per order dtd. 18.04.2019 in SU. No. 4314/11,
    NM no.4255/17 was allowed, subject to cost and on deposit
    of 50 percent of the amount of principal sum under the
    decree, which is sought to be executed. Thus, the decree
    under execution has been set aside and compliance has been
    made by the deft. therefore, execution proceeding do not
    survive. It is closed and E.A. disposed of.
    Nature of Disposal : DISCHARGED
    Disposal Date : 19-11-2019
    COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.