NOTICE OF MOTION
M/s. Welfinish Metal Processor Pvt LtdVsM/s. Central Engineering +3 more
CNR MHCC01000748201928-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 09th January 2020
TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100298/2019
- Registration Date
- 21 Jan 2019
Advocates
2For Petitioner
For Respondent
Parties
5Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 23-01-2019 Business: Adv. R. C. Mishra for Plaintiff present. Adv. P. V. Desai for Defendant no.1 and 2 present and filed vakalatnama, TOR. Subject to confirmation. Advocate for defendant has filed registered N/M no.298/19 alongwith affidavit, TOR. On the oral request of the advocate for plaintiff, Matter is adjd. to 08/03/2019 for N/M reply. Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 08-03-2019 Date: 08-03-2019 Business: None for Plaintiff. Adv. P. V. Desai for Defendant n.1to3 present. Matter is adjd. to 10/04/2019 for Reply. Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2019 Date: 10-04-2019 Business: None present Matter is Adjd for N/M Hearing to 08/08/2019 Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2019 Date: 08-08-2019 Business: P.O.is on Training. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 24-10-2019 Date: 24-10-2019 Business: Adv. Tripathi for plaintiff present. None for deft. On oral request last chance is given to plaintiff to file reply to nm. Adjd. to 09.01.2020 for nm reply. LO 11.50 p.m. Adv. Desai for deft. no. 1 to 3 present. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2020 Date: 09-01-2020 Business: Adv. Padmakar for plaintiff. Adv. Desai for defendant no.1 to 3. The plaintiff failed to file reply to the NM 298/19. Hence, the NM to proceed without reply of the plaintiff. The failure of the plaintiff to file the reply shows that the NM has not been seriously resisted. The grounds as mentioned in the application show that the defendant unaware of the technicalities approached just before the fixed date to the advocate. In other words the defendant could not appear within 10 days due to unawareness of the technicality to appear within 10 days. Considering all these circumstances and shortness of the delay i.e. of only 24 days, the delay caused is condoned and the appearance of defendant no.3 be t.o.r.subject to cost of Rs.1000/- to be paid to the plaintiff. Adjd to 23.03.2020 for steps against defendant no.4. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 09-01-2020
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100908/2019 Filing Date: 21-01-2019 First Hearing Date: 23rd January 2019 Decision Date: 09th January 2020 Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 109 Jan 2020
09 Jan 2020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Dt: 09.01.2020 SUM 1352/18 @ NM 298/19 CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT(C.R.NO.28) Adv. Padmakar for plaintiff. Adv. Desai for defendant no.1 to 3. The plaintiff failed to file reply to the NM 298/19. Hence, the NM to proceed without reply of the plaintiff. The failure of the plaintiff to file the reply shows that the NM has not been seriously resisted. The grounds as mentioned in the application show that the defendant unaware of the technicalities approached just before the fixed date to the advocate. In other words the defendant could not appear within 10 days due to unawareness of the technicality to appear within 10 days. Considering all these circumstances and shortness of the delay i.e. of only 24 days, the delay caused is condoned and the appearance of defendant no.3 be t.o.r.subject to cost of Rs.1000/ to be paid to the plaintiff. Adjd to 23.03.2020 for steps against defendant no.4. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.