EXECUTION APPLN
BALU GANGARAM AROTEVsYELUBAI SHRAVAN JADHAV
CNR MHCC010007112018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 22nd November 2018
TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100010/2018
- Registration Date
- 15 Jan 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 29-01-2018 Business: Mr. B.S.Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Mr.Patil prays for issuance of Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI r. 48 of CPC on Judgment Debtor, without issuing notice u/o. XXI r. 22 of CPC, as the Execution Application is filed within 2 years from the Decree. Advocate for Plaintiff further states that since the Execution Application for recovery amount of Rs.5,55,756.36/- as on date of application, the Decreetal amount of Rs.5,01,352.68/- will not be realised unless Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI r. 48 of CPC, is issued. Hence, issue Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI. r. 48 of CPC as prayed, returnable on 24/04/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2018 Date: 24-04-2018 Business: Shri. Patil Balbheem S. Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri Patil, adjourned to 28/06/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2018 Date: 28-06-2018 Business: Parties and Advocates absent, adjourned to 30/08/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 30-08-2018 Date: 30-08-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 30/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2018 Date: 30-10-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Patil, for submitting service report of warrants u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC, adjd to 22/11/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2018 Date: 22-11-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Patil states that warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 29/01/2018 and some amount has been received in the office of Sheriff of Mumbai. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE Disposal Date: 22-11-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100601/2018 Filing Date: 11-01-2018 First Hearing Date: 29th January 2018 Decision Date: 22nd November 2018 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
