Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Meena Gova Gohil Summ. Suit No. 1793 of 2007VsTukaram Shankar Setre

CNR MHCC010006932019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 29th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100304/2009
Registration Date
16 Jun 2009

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-01-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to  01/02/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2019
    
    Date: 01-02-2019
    Business: Shri. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Patil states that warrant of attachment u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC, has been issued dt.03/07/2009, and the employer has not remitted in any amount in compliance of the said warrant, however, the plaintiff has not taken any step till today. Shri. Patil therefore, considering time gap, prays for reissue of warrant u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC. Hence , reissue of warrant u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC returnable on 13/06/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2019
    
    Date: 13-06-2019
    Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  On request of Shri.Patil, for compliance of order of reissuance of warrant u/o.XXI  Rule 46 of CPC, returnable date is extended  till 17/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2019
    
    Date: 17-10-2019
    Business: Shri. B. S. Patil, advocate for the Plaintiff present. On request of Shri. Patil, adjd to 19/11/2019, for taking instructions.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2019
    
    Date: 19-11-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent.
    Though Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for the plaintiff has obtained the order on 01/02/2019, for reissue of order u/o.XXI Rule 46 of CPC, no any steps, have been taken in that regard by Shri. Patil.
    Hence, adjd to, 15/01/2020, by way of last chance.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020
    
    Date: 15-01-2020
    Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for the plaintiff apresent.
    As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 29/01/2020.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2020
    
    Date: 29-01-2020
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent.
    Record shows that no steps have been taken by the advocate for plaintiff, after obtaining order from this court on 01/02/2019. Hence for want of taken any steps, Exe. Application stands disposed off.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 29-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100602/2019
    Filing Date: 16-06-2009
    First Hearing Date: 25th January 2019
    Decision Date: 29th January 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.