EXECUTION APPLN
Meena Gova Gohil Summ. Suit No. 1793 of 2007VsTukaram Shankar Setre
CNR MHCC010006932019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 29th January 2020
TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100304/2009
- Registration Date
- 16 Jun 2009
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 25-01-2019 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 01/02/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2019 Date: 01-02-2019 Business: Shri. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Patil states that warrant of attachment u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC, has been issued dt.03/07/2009, and the employer has not remitted in any amount in compliance of the said warrant, however, the plaintiff has not taken any step till today. Shri. Patil therefore, considering time gap, prays for reissue of warrant u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC. Hence , reissue of warrant u/o. XXI Rule 46 of CPC returnable on 13/06/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2019 Date: 13-06-2019 Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri.Patil, for compliance of order of reissuance of warrant u/o.XXI Rule 46 of CPC, returnable date is extended till 17/10/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2019 Date: 17-10-2019 Business: Shri. B. S. Patil, advocate for the Plaintiff present. On request of Shri. Patil, adjd to 19/11/2019, for taking instructions. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2019 Date: 19-11-2019 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Though Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for the plaintiff has obtained the order on 01/02/2019, for reissue of order u/o.XXI Rule 46 of CPC, no any steps, have been taken in that regard by Shri. Patil. Hence, adjd to, 15/01/2020, by way of last chance. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020 Date: 15-01-2020 Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for the plaintiff apresent. As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 29/01/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2020 Date: 29-01-2020 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Record shows that no steps have been taken by the advocate for plaintiff, after obtaining order from this court on 01/02/2019. Hence for want of taken any steps, Exe. Application stands disposed off. Nature Of Disposal: OTHER Disposal Date: 29-01-2020
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100602/2019 Filing Date: 16-06-2009 First Hearing Date: 25th January 2019 Decision Date: 29th January 2020 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
