Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01000687201927 Sept 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 27 Sept 2019 · CNR MHCC010006872019

Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement
Pdf Text: 1 Sum. Suit 289 of 2019
Received on : 18.01.2019
Registered on : 13.02.2019
Decided on : 27.09.2019
Duration : Y M D
0 7 14
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 289 of 2019
CNR NO.: MHCC010006872019
Mr. Rajan Laxman Pawar
of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant,
aged 26 years, Occupation carrying
on Money Lending Business, in the
name of Mr. Rajan Laxman Pawar
under license No. RBE 1299, and having
his residence and office address at
Madadwala Chawl, Room No. 507,
Jay Shankar Chowk, Manwar Mandap
Decorators Lane, Halav Pul Road,
Kurla (W), Mumbai – 70. ...Plaintiff
Versus
Mr. Balu Bhimrao Shejval
of Wadala West Mumbai an adult,
Indian Inhabitant, Aged about 40 yrs.,
Occupation Service residing at
Baba Nagar, Shell Colony Road,
Opp. to Ambeyamaatta Mandir, Room
No. 52, Chembur West, Mumbai 400 071.
And also having his office address at
Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation for
-- 1 of 5 --
2 Sum. Suit 289 of 2019
Greater Mumbai, Employee No. 4107774, Pay
Sheet No. A 6207 Designation No. Samanjhak,
Department Ghana Kachara Vyavashthappan Khatte,
Near Natraj Cinema, Chembur West,
Mumbai – 71. ….Defendant
Appearances:
Advocate Mr. Balbheem Patil for the Plaintiff.
Defendants Exparte.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI.M.S.LONE
(C.R.NO.28)
DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER 2019
J U D G M E N T
This is a suit for recovery of Rs.1,65,750/(Rupees One Lac Sixty
Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty only).
2. Plaintiff case in nut shell is that on 02/06/2018 defendant
executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for valuable
consideration of Rs. 1,50,000/ the defendant also promised to pay
interest @ 18% per annum on the said amount. On 14/12/2018
plaintiff demanded the said amount but defendant refused to pay.
Defendant is in default of Rs.1,65,750/(Rupees One Lac Sixty Five
Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty only). Hence, this suit.
3. The defendant was served with summons for appearance but he
remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against him.
4. From the material on record following points come for my
determination and my findings with reasons are as follows:
-- 2 of 5 --
3 Sum. Suit 289 of 2019
POINTS FINDINGS
1. Whether plaintiff proves that
defendant executed promissory
note for valuable consideration?
Yes
2. Whether plaintiff proves that
amount of Rs.1,65,750/(Rupees
One Lac Sixty Five Thousand
Seven Hundred and Fifty only) is
due and recoverable from
defendants?
Yes
3. Whether plaintiff is entitled for
recovery of Rs.1,65,750/(Rupees
One Lac Sixty Five Thousand
Seven Hundred and Fifty only)
with interest as claimed?
Yes
4. What order and decree? As per final order
REASONS
AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4.
5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To
prove its case plaintiff examined himself vide Exhibit 7 and filed
original promissory note and notice of demand.
6. Heard Learned counsel for plaintiff.
7. The affidavit is supported by documents. The original promissory
note and advocates demand notice shows that on 02/06/2018
defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff for
valuable consideration of Rs.1,50,000/ the defendant also promised to
pay interest @ 18% p.a. on the said amount. On 14/12/2018 plaintiff
demanded the said amount but defendant refused to pay. Defendant is
in default of Rs.1,65,750/(Rupees One Lac Sixty Five Thousand Seven
-- 3 of 5 --
4 Sum. Suit 289 of 2019
Hundred and Fifty only). As far as rate of interest is concerned plaintiff
has prayed for rate of 18% p.a. The said rate of interest is mentioned in
Promissory Note and hence it is granted. Therefore, point No.1 to 3 is
answer as 'Yes' and following order is passed.
ORDER
1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs.
2. Defendant do pay to the plaintiff the amount of
Rs.1,65,750/(Rupees One Lac Sixty Five Thousand Seven
Hundred and Fifty only) with interest @ 18% p.a. from the
date of filing of the suit till full and final realization.
3. Court fee be refunded as per rules.
4. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
(M.S.LONE)
Judge,
Date: 27/09/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay
Dictated on : 27/09/2019
Transcribed on : 03/10/2019
Signed on : 03/10/2019
-- 4 of 5 --
5 Sum. Suit 289 of 2019
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGEMENT/ORDER”
UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
04/10/2019 1.26 p.m. Prachi Y. Potdar (H.G.)
Name of the Judge HHJ Shri. M.S.Lone
(C.R.NO.28)
Date of Pronouncement of
Judgment/Order.
27/09/2019
Judgment/order signed by P.O on 03/10/2019
Judgment/order uploaded on 04/10/2019
-- 5 of 5 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.