Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 18 Feb 2022 · CNR MHCC010006572020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 281 OF 2020 IN SUIT NO. 2954 OF 2014 Shree Gajanan Sahakari Patpedhi ] Ltd., ].. Plaintiff. V/s. 1. Anand Narayan Sawant and ] others. ]..Defendants. Advocate Mr. Umesh Desai for the plaintiff. Advocate Mr. Ajit Hodge for defendant No.2. Advocate Mr. Sachin Kadam for defendant No.3/State. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI VIDYADHAR B. KAKATKAR (C.R.No.09). DATE : 18th FEBRUARY, 2022 ORDER The Notice of Motion is taken out by defendant No.3 for condonation of delay for filing written statement and accepting written statement on record. There is delay of 200 days. After amendment, the defendant was served on 20.05.2019. It is stated that the concerned department did not give instructions within time, hence, written statement could not be filed on record. 2. The Notice of Motion is objected by the plaintiff on the ground that delay is in ordinate and the Court has no power to condone the delay beyond 90 days for filing written statement. -- 1 of 3 -- 2 3. I have heard learned advocate for the defendant No.3 and the plaintiff at length. 4. The record shows that there is delay of 200 days in filing written statement. The defendant No.3 was added subsequently by amending the title cause of the plaint. Defendant No.3 is the Government Department and therefore in order to file written statement, it has to follow certain process for getting certain instructions from its office. Anyhow, it cannot be treated separately. So far as objection that the Court cannot accept written statement after 90 days is not acceptable in order to adjudicate matter totally. It is necessary to give an opportunity to defendant No.3 to file written statement. Therefore, I am inclined to condone the delay for accepting written statement subject to the payment of costs. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order. O R D E R 1. Notice of Motion No.281 of 2020 is allowed subject to the payment of costs of Rs. 5,000/– by defendant No.3 to the plaintiff. 2. On payment of costs, written statement of defendant No.3 be accepted for taking on record. 3. Notice of Motion No.281 of 2020 is disposed of accordingly. (VIDYADHAR B. KAKATKAR) Judge, City Civil Court, Date:18.02.2022 Gr.Mumbai. Dictated on: 18.02.2022 Typed on : 18.02.2022 Signed on : 01.03.2022 -- 2 of 3 -- 3 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” RE-UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 01.03.2022 AT 2.30 P.M. MRS. SUPRIYA S. PAWAR Name of the Judge (with Court Room no.) HHJ SHRI VIDYADHAR B. KAKATKAR (C.R. No.09) Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 18.02.2022 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 01.03.2022 Judgment/Order re-uploaded on 01.03.2022 -- 3 of 3 --
