Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 23 Feb 2021 · CNR MHCC010006482020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 259/20 MHCC010006482020 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 259 OF 2020 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 268 OF 2017 Arjun Ramani HUF Through its Karta and Manager Arjun Ramani, Age years, of Mumbai an adult Indian having his address at West End Hotel, 45 New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400 020. ...Plaintiff VERSUS 1. National Laminate Corporation a Partnership Firm carrying on business at and from 209, Sangam Arcade, Vallabbhai Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai 400056 2.Kanch Ghar a Partnership Firm carrying on business at and from Shop No. 1, Abhishek Bldg., Vallabbhai Road, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai 3.Shantilal Ladhabhai Shah 4. Laljibhai Khirabhai Shah 5. Subhash Lalji Shah -- 1 of 4 -- 2 NM 259/20 6. Forum Dhaval Shah Age and full name not known, All are of Mumbai, adult, Indian Inhabitant, Partner of Kanchghar, carrying on business at and from Shop No. 1, Abhishek Bldg., Vallabbhai Road, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai- 40056 And residing at 208 Sangam Arcade 2nd Floor, Opp. Rly. Sttioin,Vallabbhai Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai 400056 7. Jayantilal Nisar, Age and Full name not known, of Mumbai, adult, Indian Inhabitant, Partner of National Laminate Corporation at and from 209 Sangam Arcade, 2nd Floor, Opp. Rly. Station, Vallabbhai Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai 400 056. ...Defendants Appearances: Ld. Advocate Mr. Ramesh Jain for the plaintiff Ld. Advocate Ms. Pravina Kanani for the defendants CORAM : HIS HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT (C.R. NO. 28) DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY, 2021 ORDER Vide present notice of motion, the defendant requested to condone the delay of about 142 days caused in filing reply to summons for judgment. It appears that the plaintiff has given no objection to allow the notice of motion subject to costs. Neither the defendants nor their Advocate appeared to advance any arguments. The delay caused is of 142 days, the reasons mentioned are that defendant No. 3 was not keeping well and was admitted in ICU. As such, he could not give instruction for preparing the reply as he was in coma. Defendant No. 7 was not aware about the present matter and as such delay has been -- 2 of 4 -- 3 NM 259/20 caused. Considering the reason given in the notice of motion, the submissions on behalf of the plaintiff in the nature of no objection subject to costs, the quantum of delay, it is just and proper to allow the the notice of motion subject to costs of Rs. 3000/-. Hence, order as follows is passed:- ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No. 259 of 2020 is allowed subject to cost as under. 2. Delay caused to the defendants to file reply to summons for judgment is condoned and reply of the defendants be accepted on record, subject to costs of Rs.3000/- (Rs. Three Thousand Only) to be paid to the plaintiff by the defendants. (Deepak L. Bhagwat) Ad-hoc Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai Date: 23.02.2021 Dictated on : 23.02.2021 Transcribed on : 24.02.2021 Date of sign : 24.02.2021 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 NM 259/20 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE & TIME : 24.02.2021 5.00 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : S.S.BATHE Name of Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri.D.L.Bhagwat (C.R.NO.28) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT /ORDER 23.02.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER signed by P.O. on 24.02.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER uploaded on 24.02.2021 -- 4 of 4 --
