Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Mr. Dilip Bhupendernath Bhattacharya +1 moreVsSsmt. Santona Swapan Bhattacharya +2 more

CNR MHCC01000629201862-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 30th September 2021

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100857/2018
Registration Date
23 Mar 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    5

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-04-2018
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adjd to 30.6.2018 for direction.
    Next Hearing Date: 30-06-2018
    
    Date: 30-06-2018
    Business: Adv.Mr.Hari Om Mishra for Plff.present.
    None for defendant.
    Issue writ of summons to the defendants for filing written statement and settlement of issues on payment of necessary charges.
    Plaintiff is directed to tender on record original registered N/m No. 1591/18 on next date.
    Adjd.for service on 29.10.2018.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2018
    
    Date: 29-10-2018
    Business: Both the parties and their advocates are absent.
    Adjd.for service on 30.04.2019.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 30-04-2019
    
    Date: 30-04-2019
    Business: Court is busy in hearing NM argument in suit no.3214/18 and court has to hear urgent matters, hence case is adjourned to 19/08/2019.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2019
    
    Date: 19-08-2019
    Business: Court is busy in hearing and dictating order on Notice of Motion no.2080/19 in suit no.7386/06 and at the time of dictating order on Notice of Motion no.2080/19, electricity supply has disconnected, hence remaining board of second session is discharged and case is adjourned to 10/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2019
    
    Date: 10-10-2019
    Business: None present for Plaintiff.
    None present for Defendant.
    Case is adjourned to 13/12/2019 for Service/NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2019
    
    Date: 13-12-2019
    Business: As Court is on leave, adjourned to 06-03-2020.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2020
    
    Date: 13-12-2019
    Business: As Court is on leave, adjourned to 06-03-2020.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2020
    
    Date: 06-03-2020
    Business: Court is on Leave.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2020
    
    Date: 03-07-2020
    Business: Matter is adjd. to 04.09.2020 due to Covid -19.
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2020
    
    Date: 03-07-2020
    Business: Matter is adjd. to 04.09.2020 due to Covid -19.
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2020
    
    Date: 04-09-2020
    Business: Due to covid-19
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2020
    
    Date: 04-09-2020
    Business: Due to covid-19
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2020
    
    Date: 25-11-2020
    Business: None present for Plaintiffs.
    None present for Defendants.
    It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 11/02/2021
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2021
    
    Date: 11-02-2021
    Business: None present for both the parties.
    Plff though has got the NM registered as NM No.1591/2018 as per the leave granted on 11.04.2018, said registered  NM  is not tendered in Court till date hence, said NM is dismissed in default.
    Plff to file affidavit of service of writ of summons on deft.
    Adjd. for affidavit of service of writ of summons to 23.04.2021.
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2021
    
    Date: 11-02-2021
    Business: None present for both the parties.
    Plff though has got the NM registered as NM No.1591/2018 as per the leave granted on 11.04.2018, said registered  NM  is not tendered in Court till date hence, said NM is dismissed in default.
    Plff to file affidavit of service of writ of summons on deft.
    Adjd. for affidavit of service of writ of summons to 23.04.2021
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2021
    
    Date: 23-04-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2021
    
    Date: 22-07-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2021
    
    Date: 30-09-2021
    Business: None present for both the parties.
    Despite granting several opportunities, plaintiffs have not filed affidavit of service of writ of summons.
    Nobody appeared for the plaintiffs today also. There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence of plaintiffs and for want of service writ of summons as roznama shows that nobody has attended the matter for and on behalf of plaintiff since after 30.06.2018. Hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
    Disposal Date: 30-09-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100682/2018
    Filing Date: 12-01-2018
    First Hearing Date: 13th April 2018
    Decision Date: 30th September 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    30 Sept 2021
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 30/09/2021 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI P.P.RAJVAIDYA (C.R. NO.62)
    18
    SU 857/18
    None present for both the parties.
    Despite granting several opportunities, plaintiffs have not filed
    affidavit of service of writ of summons.
    Nobody appeared for the plaintiffs today also. There is no
    propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence
    of plaintiffs and for want of service writ of summons as
    roznama shows that nobody has attended the matter for and
    on behalf of plaintiff since after 30.06.2018. Hence, suit is
    dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
    Judge*
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.