Skip to main content
MISC APPLICATION

Madukar Sadashiv Kamble in Exe. Appln. No.428 of 18 in S/J.318 of 16 in Sum. Su. No.410 of 16VsMrs. Naina Ichharam Panchal +2 more

CNR MHCC01000628201928-COURT 28 AD-HOC JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 21st June 2019

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100006/2019
Registration Date
17 Jan 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-01-2019
    Business: Shri. J.P.Singh, advocate for third party applicant present. Shri. Yash Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Jain seeks time to file reply to the Misc. application taken out by the applicant and by consent for reply, adjourned to 08/02/2019.
    Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
    Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2019
    
    Date: 08-02-2019
    Business: Shri. J.P. Singh, advocate for applicant (third party) present. Shri. P. Ranjan, advocate for plaintiff in exe. Application 428/2018 present.  Shri. Ranjan seeks time to file reply to the Misc. application. Hence, by consent adjourned to 15/03/2019.
    Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
    Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2019
    
    Date: 15-03-2019
    Business: Shri. Vikram Singh, advocate for applicant is present. None for plaintiff and defendant in exe.application no. 428/2018.  For reply of plaintiff to this M.A, adjourned to 26/03/2019, by way of last chance.
    Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
    Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2019
    
    Date: 26-03-2019
    Business: Shri. Mahesh Tiwari, advocate for applicant in M.A. No. 06/2019, is present. Applicant, Shri. Varun Lahir, is also present. None for plaintiff and defendant in exe.application no. 428/2018. M.A. marked as Exh. A (Colly). Shri. Tiwari, states that despite adjournments, no reply has been filed by the plaintiff to the present M.A. And therefore, he prays that Show Cause Notice be issued to the plaintiff as to why the order of issuance of warrant of attachment should not be revoked and he also prays that short service may be allowed. Application filed today by the applicant Shri. Varun Lahir, for withdrawal/cancellation of warrants of attachment and for taking appropriate action, taken on record and marked as Exh.B. Hence upon hearing the advocate for applicant issue show cause notice to the plaintiff as to why the warrants of attachment should not be revoked, returnable on 10/04/2019. On request of advocate for the applicant short service by Humdast be allowed.
    Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
    Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2019
    
    Date: 10-04-2019
    Business: Shri. Vikram Singh advocate for applicant (third party) present. Shri. Sanjay Gidh, advocate for the defendant present.  None for plaintiff. On request of advocate for defendant and advocate for third party, adjd to 12/04/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-04-2019
    
    Date: 12-04-2019
    Business: Shri.Pratyush Ranjan, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Sanjay Gidh, advocate for defendant present. Shri. Murtaza Patanwala, advocate for third party present. Shri. Ranjan states that matter is already become contested upon filing of Misc.application 06/2019, by the third party and Misc.application no.38/2019, by the defendant. Shri.Ranjan further states that, he is intendign to take out apporipriate proceeding against the obstructionist and he therefore, submits that present exe.application alongwith both the misc.applications be referred to the Honourable Court for appropriate orders. Advocates for the defendant and for third party have no objection for the same. In view of this, exe.application no.428/2018, alongwith M.A.No.06/2019 and M.A. No.38/2019, are hereby submitted to the Honourable Court No.28 on 15/04/2019. Office to take steps to assign the matters to the court no.28. Parties and advocates to appear before the Court No.28 on 15/04/2019. Copy of this Roznama be pasted in M.A.No.06/2019 and M.A.No.38/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2019
    
    Date: 15-04-2019
    Business: Adv for DH Mr.Yash Jain present
    Matter is  Adjd for Reply/Consent Terms to 03/07/2019
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2019
    
    Date: 21-06-2019
    Business: By Precipe,
    Power of Attorney holder of Plaintiff present
    Power of Attorney holder of deft present
    Adv for DH Mr.P Ranjan present
    Adv for Jd Mr.Sanjay Gidh present
    Third Party Applicant Mr.Varun present
    He stated that he has not pressing Misc Application no 06/19
    In Misc Application 38/19 power of attorney of defendant stated that they are not pressing.
    FRSR following order is passed
    Order Below Exh 2
    1. Consent Terms are taken on Record.
    Order Below Exh 1
    Consent terms (Exh 2) are taken on record.  As the matter is settled between the parties in Terms of Consent Terms (Exh 2.) Therefore, the Execution Proceedings stands disposed of.
    Order
    Miscellaneous Application No. 38 of 2019 stands filed.
    Order
    Miscellaneous Application No. 6 of 2019 stands filed.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 21-06-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100617/2019
    Filing Date: 15-01-2019
    First Hearing Date: 18th January 2019
    Decision Date: 21st June 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 AD-HOC JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    21 Jun 2019

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: :1: M.A. No.6/2019 in Execution Appln. No.428/2018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2019 CNR NO.:MHCC010006282019 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2018 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.318 OF 2016 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.410 OF 2016 Madhukar Sadashiv Kamble ]...Plaintiff Versus Mrs. Naina Iccharam Panchal ]...Defendant And Mr. Varun A. Lahir ]...Applicant Appearances: Advocate Mr. Pratyush Ranjan for D.H. Advocate Mr. Sanjay Gidh for J.D. CORAM : HER HONOUR…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.