Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Ms Gloria Development CorproationVsSatish Dhondu Pawar And Ors

CNR MHCC0100054220182-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 03rd December 2018

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100092/2018
Registration Date
12 Jan 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Ms Gloria Development Corproation

    Respondent

    1. 1Satish Dhondu Pawar And Ors

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 12-01-2018
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adjd to 21.2.2018 for N/M reply.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2018

Date: 21-02-2018
Business: PO is on training.
Adjd to 17.4.2018
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2018

Date: 17-04-2018
Business: Adv. Mr. Deshmukh for Plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
He filed Ch/s. No. 92/18.
Plaintiff is directed to serve NM No.  912/17 through bailiff.
Adjd. To 22.06.2018 for Service
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2018

Date: 22-06-2018
Business: Adv.Ms.Tanvi Sangle for Plff.present.
None for defendant.
On oral request of adv.for Plff.adjd.for service on 03.10.2018.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2018

Date: 03-10-2018
Business: Adv Balasaheb Deshmukh for Plff present.
Adjd.to 03/12/2018  for service
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2018

Date: 03-12-2018
Business: Adv.Mr.Balasaheb Deshmukh for Plff.present.
None for defendant.
Heard adv.for Plaintiff in Ch/s No.92/2018.
Order below Ch/s No.92/2018
Perused Ch/s which is supported by an affidavit.   From the documents placed on record I am satisfied that there is reason to be give that the defendants are keeping out of for the purpose of avoiding service.  Hence under the given circumstances, the applicant is permitted to to serve the Notice by way of substituted service as per the provisions of Order 5, Rule 23 of C.P.C.  Hence I pass the following order.
ORDER
1 Chamber summons No.92/2018 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2 Chamber summons is disposed of accordingly.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 03-12-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100657/2018
Filing Date: 12-01-2018
First Hearing Date: 12th January 2018
Decision Date: 03rd December 2018
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    03 Dec 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 03.12.2018
SU7561/04
(Disp.off)
CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.KISHORE M.JAISWAL (CR. NO. 02)
Adv.Mr.Balasaheb Deshmukh for Plff.present.
None for defendant.
Heard adv.for Plaintiff in Ch/s No.92/2018.
Order below Ch/s No.92/2018
Perused Ch/s which is supported by an affidavit. From the documents
placed on record I am satisfied that there is reason to be give that the
defendants are keeping out of for the purpose of avoiding service.
Hence under the given circumstances, the applicant is permitted to to
serve the Notice by way of substituted service as per the provisions of
Order 5, Rule 23 of C.P.C. Hence I pass the following order.
ORDER
1 Chamber summons No.92/2018 is allowed and made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a).
2 Chamber summons is disposed of accordingly.
Adjd.for N/m service on 18.02.2019.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.