Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mohammed Kasim Mid-Day - Suit St. No.539 of 2019VsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100053720195-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 06th July 2019

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100194/2019
Registration Date
15 Jan 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-01-2019
    Business: Resumed.
    Adv. M. A. Vaid for plaintiff tendered registered NM No. 194/2019 with affidavit.  He also tendered affidavit of service and compilation of documents, consisting of copies of rent receipt and electricity bills.  He further submits that the proposed action is based on the notice issued U/s 354 A of MMC Act dtd. 17.01.2012,  in respect of which suit no. 188/2012 is pending.  According to him the action is based on the order dtd. 23.02.2016, by which the said suit was dismissed in default.  He further submit that the plaintiff was not party to that suit and that the said suit related to room no. 32.  He further submits that the landlord has instituted suit no. 2016/2013 in which the plaintiff is the def. no. 4 and the said suit is pending for hearing.  According to him the landlord recently instituted suit for eviction against the plaintiff from the room no. 33 and the summons is served on the plaintiff.  Thus, he submits that identity of room no. 33 is not in dispute. He further submits that no notice has been issued to the plaintiff in respect of room no. 33 and therefore, the proposed action is illegal.
             Adv. Dhumale for MCGM with Mr. Ganesh Thakur, SE, C ward, and Mr. Somesh Shinde, SE are present.
            Adv. Dhumale for MCGM by filing a compilation of documents submit that the notice dtd. 17.01.2012,  was issued u/s 354 A in respect of the entire fourth floor level, in respect of which the aforesaid suit no. 188/2012 was instituted and as the same was dismissed for default, all the interim orders are vacated and therefore, on 12.01.2019 the defendant demolished the fourth floor structures and therefore, now this suit has become infractus.  Mr. Thakur also submits that the entire notice structure is demolished.  He submits that the vertical extension of room no. 33 is demolished.
             In the circumstances the intervention of this Court at this stage is not warranted.  Therefore, the following order is passed -
    1.  Ad-interim relief is rejected.
           The ld. Advocate for plaintiff submits that on the basis of submissions made by the defendant, both the present suit as well as suit no. 2016/2013 should be disposed off.  Considering these submissions as well as the fact that issues are framed in suit no. 2016/2013 today morning, necessary orders will be passed in due course.
    
    Adjd for reply to 26.02.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2019
    
    Date: 26-02-2019
    Business: Adv. Naik for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Dhumale for defendant no. /MCGM present.
    Adv. Ansari for deft. no. 4 present.
    Application for dispose the suit filed by Adv. of plaintiff. O- Other side to say.
    Matter adjd. to 26.3.19 for Evidence of plaintiff.
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2019
    
    Date: 26-03-2019
    Business: Plaintiff and his advocate absent.
    Adv.Shri Dhumale for defendant/MCGM present.
    Adv.Mr.Imtiyaz I. Patel for intervener present.
    Matter adjd to 15.06.2019 for R/E.
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019
    
    Date: 15-06-2019
    Business: Plaintiff and his Adv.absent.
    Adv.Mrs.Rawade for defendant/MCGM present.
    Matter adjd to 06.07.2019 for R/E.
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
    Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2019
    
    Date: 06-07-2019
    Business: Adv.G.B.Naik for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Rawade for defendant/MCGM present.
    The Adv.of Plaintiff had filed Exh.6 for disposal of the suit. It is contended that the BMC had filed report on 17.01.2019 informing that the suit structure is demolished. It is contended in the light of the submission made by MCGM the suit be disposed off. In view of the contention the Plaintiff does not seem to be interested to prosecute the suit. The suit stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The Notice of Motion 194/2019 also stands dismissed.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 06-07-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100606/2019
    Filing Date: 15-01-2019
    First Hearing Date: 17th January 2019
    Decision Date: 06th July 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 5-COURT 05  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    06 Jul 2019
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF HHJ Shri. S.C. Pathare
    COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No.: NOTICE OF MOTION / 100194 / 2019 CNR Number: MHCC010005372019
    Mohammed Kasim Mid-Day - Suit St. No.539 of 2019 Vs MCGM
    Vaid And Associates Advocate /
    Todays Date Roznama Next/Disposal Date
    06-07-2019
    Adv.G.B.Naik for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Smt.Rawade for defendant/MCGM present.
    The Adv.of Plaintiff had filed Exh.6 for disposal of the
    suit. It is contended that the BMC had filed report on
    17.01.2019 informing that the suit structure is
    demolished. It is contended in the light of the submission
    made by MCGM the suit be disposed off. In view of the
    contention the Plaintiff does not seem to be interested to
    prosecute the suit. The suit stands dismissed for want of
    prosecution. The Notice of Motion 194/2019 also stands
    dismissed.
    DISMISSED: Proceeding is closed
    Judge
    06-07-2019
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.