Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

VAISHNAVI VIJAY BHATKARVsMR. AMRNATH RAJARAM BHOSALE

CNR MHCC01000530201813-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--COMPROMISE
Decision Date: 10th January 2022

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100026/2017
Registration Date
12 Jan 2017

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 20-02-2018
    
    Date: 20-03-2018
    
    Date: 26-04-2018
    
    Date: 02-05-2018
    
    Date: 17-07-2018
    
    Date: 06-09-2018
    
    Date: 16-01-2019
    
    Date: 26-03-2019
    
    Date: 26-06-2019
    
    Date: 22-08-2019
    
    Date: 30-09-2019
    
    Date: 29-11-2019
    
    Date: 30-01-2020
    
    Date: 04-03-2020
    
    Date: 16-06-2020
    
    Date: 18-07-2020
    
    Date: 25-09-2020
    
    Date: 13-10-2020
    
    Date: 27-01-2021
    
    Date: 10-02-2021
    
    Date: 22-02-2021
    
    Date: 04-03-2021
    
    Date: 05-03-2021
    
    Date: 08-04-2021
    
    Date: 20-07-2021
    
    Date: 15-09-2021
    
    Date: 12-11-2021
    
    Date: 10-01-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100527/2018
    Filing Date: 12-01-2017
    First Hearing Date: 20th February 2018
    Decision Date: 10th January 2022
    Court Number And Judge: 13-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    10 Jan 2022
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 13 ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :EXECUTION APPLN/0100026/2017
    VAISHNAVI VIJAY BHATKAR Vs MR. AMRNATH RAJARAM BHOSALE
    Date : 10-01-2022
    Business : Matter Pertaining C. R. No. 13. Adv. Rajesh Kanojia for DH
    present. Adv. Tejash Mahamuni for JD present. Advocate
    Rane for applicant of CHS. 913/2021. The applicant of CHS
    submitted that, the dispute is settled between parties by
    consent term. Therefore he do not want to proceed with
    CHS. Accordingly CHS stand disposed of. Decree Holder
    Vaishnvi Bhatkar &ampamp Judgment Debtor
    Amarnath Bhosle are present with their advocate. They have
    filed consent term Exh-3 along with self attested copy of
    their ID prof. Both the parties have identified by their
    respective advocates. Both the parties have admitted terms
    of settlement and signature there on. Today the plaintiff has
    filed receipt, to show that she has received 1,50,000/- along
    with Xerox copy of Pay Order. In terms of settlement by
    consent terms, EA petitions stands disposed off. If any
    Process has already been issued, that be called back.
    Nature of Disposal : COMPROMISE
    Disposal Date : 10-01-2022
    COURT 13 ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.