Full Order Text
Order 1 · 15 Jan 2019 · CNR MHCC010005072019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY Draft notice of motion In Suit No. 108 of 2019 Ramesh Narayan Suryavanshi ...Plaintiff V/s Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay ..Defendants Advocate S.S.Kharat for plaintiff Adv G.O.Giri for defendant/MMC CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. G.B.GURAO DATE : 15th January, 2019 (Court Room No.06) O R D E R 1 Plaintiff has taken out this draft notice of motion to restrain the defendant Municipal Corporation from demolishing the suit property i.e. shop no. V/N/A 101,Plot No. 144, Ashok Mills Compound, Sant Rohidas Marg, Kala Killa, Dharavi, Mumbai 400 017 on the basis of notice dated 26/10/2018 U/s 351 of MMC Act and order dated 2/01/2019 2 Facts in brief are as under: Plaintiff is in use and occupation of the suit premises. The suit premises is in existence prior to 1995. Plaintiff is carrying business of selling onions and potatoes in the suit premises. The suit premises is censused to Municipal record in the year 2000. Plaintiff has census survey slip dated 7/8/2000. Plaintiff has certificate under the Shops and Establishment Act. Plaintiff has electricity meter at the address of the suit premises. Thus, the plaintiff is in continuous possession of the -- 1 of 4 -- 2 suit premises. The suit premises is under Dharavi Rehabilitation project. Earlier one Mr. Subhash Jadhav was in occupation of the premises. Plaintiff acquired rights of the suit premises in the year 1998. However, some antisocial elements gave complaints in respect of the suit premises and accordingly the defendant issued a notice U/s 351 of MMC Act. Plaintiff had filed L.C.Suit no. 2027/2018. This Court had directed the defendant to follow the due process of law. Thereafter, defendant initiated the proceeding U/s 351 of MMC Act. Plaintiff gave reply to the defendant. However, the designated officer has passed order without application of mind. Hence, prayed to grant ad interim relief. 3 Shri S.S.Kharat advocate for plaintiff has submitted that the suit premises is in existence prior to 1995. Plaintiff is running her business of Onion and Potatoes from the year 1998. Plaintiff has necessary documents i.e. certificate under shops and establishment Act, electricity bill at the address of suit premises. The designated officer has passed the order without application of mind. Hence, prayed to grant ad interim relief. 4 Shri G.O.Giri advocate for defendant has submitted that the concerned officer has made inspection and he found that plaintiff has not running the business of onions and potatoes. On the contrary, there is Public Relation Office of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena in the suit premises. He further submitted that plaintiff has not proved authenticity of the structure. Hence, prayed to refuse the ad interim relief. 5 In this suit plaintiff has challenged the notice U/s 351 of the MMC Act and order passed thereon. In the schedule of the notice it -- 2 of 4 -- 3 is alleged that plaintiff has made unauthorized construction with brick masonry walls admeasuring 2m x 2.5m and having height 3mt at Ashok Mill Compound, Sant Rohidas Marg, Dharavi, Mumbai400 017. To prove the authenticity of the structure plaintiff has filed the Shops and Establishment Act certificate, electricity bill receipts issued by Dharavi Rehabilitation project and affidavit of Subhash Pandurang Jadhav. However, these documents do not prove the authenticity of the structure. On the contrary from the inspection report produced by defendant, it appears that plaintiff has no shop at the address of the suit premises. There is Public Relation Office of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena. Thus, plaintiff has suppressed the facts from the Court. Hence, in such a circumstances, I find that plaintiff is not entitled for ad interim relief. Therefore following order: ORDER 1 Ad interim relief is refused. 2 Draft notice of motion be registered. (G.B.Gurao) Judge, City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 15/01/2019 Typed on : 16/01/2019 Signed by HHJ. : 16/01/2019 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 “ CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” S.D. Raje UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER (H.G.) Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri. G.B.Gurao (CR.No.06) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGEMENT/ORDER 15/01/2019 JUDGEMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on JUDGEMENT/ORDER uploaded on -- 4 of 4 --
