Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01000500201806 Mar 2018
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 06 Mar 2018 · CNR MHCC010005002018

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 1 TA7.18
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
Transfer Application No.7 of 2018
Vinod Natesan ..Plaintiff
V/s.
Elements Homestead Products
Pvt.Ltd. ..Defendant
Coram : H.H.THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Mrs.P.V. GANEDIWALA
Dated : 6th March,2018
(C.R.No.19)
Plaintiff in person.
Defendant and advocate absent.
O R A L O R D E R
The Applicant/plaintiff in person filed the present
application for transfer of his bearing Suit No.817/2015 from C.R.
No.32 to any other court on the ground of delay in trial.
2 It is the case of the plaintiff that he filed an application
Exh.4 in the suit for recalling of the order of taking written statement
on record and the said application is pending for decision since
October,2015.
3 The defendant, in spite of service of summons, did not
appear. I perused the report, called from the concerned court.
4 As per the report, the present presiding officer took the
charge of C.R. No.32 in April,2017 and the present suit came before her
-- 1 of 3 --
2 TA7.18
in June,2017. In the meantime, other circumstances arose in the suit
which includes Exh.8 by the present application for issue of process for
submission of false evidence by the defendant. The ld.advocate for the
defendant in the suit also has withdrawn his appearance. In this way,
the delay caused in deciding Exh.4.
5 I have considered the submissions of the plaintiff in person
and the report of the concerned presiding officer. I do not find any
ground for transfer. In present scenario, nobody will deny about huge
pendency of the cases and delay in the trial for one reason or the other.
Even if the matter is transferred, there is no guarantee that the
transferee court will have sufficient time to deal with the applications
like Exh.4 and Exh.8 of the party in person, expeditiously. In such
circumstances, no ground for transfer is made out. However, I request
the presiding officer to try to avoid the unnecessary delay in the trial.
Plaintiff to cooperate the court in proceeding expeditiously with the
trial as per the provisions of law, by avoiding to file unnecessary
applications. Hence, I pass the following order:
O R D E R
T.A. No.7/18 stands rejected.
06/03/2018 (P.V. GANEDIWALA)
Principal Judge,
Gr.Bombay.
Dictated on : 06/03/2018
Transcribed on : 06/03/2018
Signed by HHJ on :
-- 2 of 3 --
3 TA7.18
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER
Name of Stenographers: Mrs.Aruna S. Jayade
Upload date and time: 08/03/2018 (5.00 p.m.)
Name of the Judge H.H.THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Mrs.P.V.GANEDIWALA(C.R.No.19)
Date of Pronouncement of Order 6th March,2018
Order signed by P.O. on 8th March,2018
Order uploaded on 8th March,2018
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.