Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 08 Dec 2023 · CNR MHCC010004532020
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 61 Dt:08.12.2023 SU 1177/2015 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI S.H. SALUNKHE ( C.R. No. 04 ) Adv. Babu h/f Bhat for Plaintiff present Advocate Suryavanshi h/f Mhatre for defendant No.1/BMC present. None for Defendant No. 2 Following order is passed on Ch/S No.55/2020. O R D E R 1. The plaintiff has taken out this Ch/S under order 6 rule 17 of CPC for amendment in the plaint. By way of proposed amendment the plaintiff is seeking permission to incorporate contention regarding entitlement of the plaintiff for permanent alternate accommodation and relief to that effect. It is stated that after filing suit, defendant No. 2 to check of the suit premises. By order dated 07.05.2015 this Court has directed defendant No. 2 to make arrangement of proper alternate accommodation or to provide compensation or rent. Therefore plaintiff is seeking permission to incorporate contention in respect of entitlement of plaintiff for alternate accommodation. It is further submitted proposed amendment is just and necessary for adjudication of dispute. 2. Defendant/BMC No. 1 opposed ch/s stating that if the amendment is allowed there will be change in nature of suit. Hence ch/s is not maintainable. 3. Deft No. 2 opposed chamber summons while filing reply dated 30.01.2020. It is stated that proposed amendment tantamount to changing cause of action. The ch/s is filed with sole intention to delay the trial of the suit. The Suit is posted for evidence of plaintiff but in order to prolonge the trial of the suit, present ch/s has been taken out. The plaintiff is seeking to incorporate contention in respect of relief to which this Court has no jurisdiction and small causes Court has jurisdiction. On this ground deft no. 2 prayed for dismissal of ch/s. 4. Heard Adv. for the plaintiff and Adv for deft/BMC. None present for deft No. 2, hence matter proceeded -- 1 of 3 -- further without argument of deft No. 2. Perused Ch/S, affidavit in support thereof and documents on record. 5. The plaintiff has taken out the Ch/S for amendment in the plaint. The plaintiff is seeking permission to incorporate contentions regarding entitlement of the plaintiff for permanent alternate accommodation and relief to that effect. It is stated that after filing suit def No. 2 to possession of the suit premises. By order dated 07.05.2015 this Court has directed deft No. 2 to make arrangement of proper alternate accommodation or to provide compensation or rent. 6. The law on the point of amendment is well settled. The Court has to be liberal while allowing amendment in the plaint at pretrial stage if proposed amendment is just and necessary, there is no likely to change in nature of the suit and no prejudice would cause to other side. I gone through the proposed amendment. The plaintiff is seeking permission to insert contention in respect of his entitlement for permanent alternate accommodation. The plaintiff has challenged notice u/s 354 of MMC Act. 7. Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of LIC V/s Sanjeev Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Anrs. (Civil Appeal No. 5909/2022 ) held that all the amendment are to be allowed which are necessary for determining real question in controversy provided it does not cause injustice and prejudice to other side and this is mandatory as per provision of order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. 8. The Suit is at pretrial stage. The plaintiff by way of proposed amendment, seeking permission to incorporate pleading in respect of his entitlement Permanent alternate accommodation. The plaintiff has challenging notice under 354 of MMC Act for demolition of dilapidated building. Thus, it appears that the proposed amendment is just and necessary for effective and complete adjudication of the dispute. The nature of Suit is not likely to be changed if the proposed amendment is allowed and no prejudice or injustice would cause to other side. Therefore, Ch/S No. 54/2020 deserves to be allowed. Hence, I pass following -- 2 of 3 -- order- O R D E R 1. Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). 2. Plaintiff to carry out necessary amendment within two weeks. 3. Copy of amended plaint be served upon other side. 4. Chamber Summons stands disposed of accordingly. Adjd to 09.01.2024 for Compliance Judge -- 3 of 3 --
