Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Suyog Telematics Limited Through Mr. Shivshankar LatureVsThe Asst. Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

CNR MHCC0100045120208-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 17th February 2020

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100169/2020
Registration Date
13 Jan 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-01-2020
    Business: (Incharge Court of C.R.No.8)
    Adv. Mr. Ansari Asgar Kalim for Plaintiff present.
    None for Defendant/MCGM.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Matter adjd. to 03.02.2020 for ad-interim hearing.
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 03-02-2020
    
    Date: 03-02-2020
    Business: Adv.Ansari for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present.
    On oral request of advocate for Defendant, adjournment granted as last chance.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjd to 17.02.2020 for Ad-interim hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2020
    
    Date: 17-02-2020
    Business: Adv.Ansari Asggar Kalim for plaintiff present and tendered original NM-169/2020 along with affidavit in support and also tendered original writ of summons t.o.r. it is marked at Exh-2.
    Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present.
    Mr. Nitin Vaity submitted that Jr..Engineer (M) West ward present.
    Heard both sides on Ad-interim hearing.
    Mr. Nitin Vaity stated that , only that the corporation was issued normal letter to the plaintiff asking permission for the mobile tower. I assured that,  the corporation/MCGM will follow due process of law in this case without fail.
    It is stated by Adv.Asari that, by hand application is already filed on 02.01.2020.
    It may be consider on merit and defendant corporation is direct to pass order.
    1.     Defendant/MCGM shall not take any coercive action for two weeks if any adverse order goes against the plaintiff.
    2.   Corporation shall take fine/penalty for making delay in application dtd. 02.01.2020 for regularization/permission of mobile tower as per rule.
    3.     Corporation shall take decision on the application of plaintiff as early as possible on merit and supervise as per the direction seen para A- of telecom tower policy dtd.17.02.2018 scrpuplously from plaintiff.
    NM stands disposed of.
    Suit stands disposed of in view of above order.
    Authenticated copies be given to the both parties.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 17-02-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100513/2020
    Filing Date: 13-01-2020
    First Hearing Date: 17th January 2020
    Decision Date: 17th February 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    17 Feb 2020

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 8 ASST SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100169/2020 Suyog Telematics Limited Through Mr. Shivshankar Lature Vs The Asst. Municipal Commissioner and Ors. Date : 17-02-2020 Business : Adv.Ansari Asggar Kalim for plaintiff present and tendered original NM-169/2020 along with affidavit in support and also tendered original writ of summons t.o.r. it is marked at Exh-2. Adv. Khandagle for MCGM/Deft. present. Mr. Nitin Vaity submitted that Jr..Engineer (M) West ward…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.