Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MUMBAIVsTamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd. +2 more

CNR MHCC01000438202059-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102639/2022
Registration Date
03 Dec 2022
Next Hearing Date
16 Feb 2027
Case Stage
FOR TAKING STEPS

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MUMBAI

    Respondent

    1. 1Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd.
    2. 2Metcraft Alloys P. Ltd.
    3. 3M/s. MSC Agency (India) Pvt. Ltd.

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 03-11-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Till date the plaintiff failed to remove office objection. Already notice to that effect is displayed on board and thereby directed the plaintiff to remove the office objection. However the plaintiff failed to do so. It reveals that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter. Hence it stands disposed off. Suit be registered for statistical purpose.
Disposal Date: 03-11-2022

Date: 22-07-2024
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2024

Date: 18-10-2024
Business: None present from both the sides.
Matter is adjd to 13.02.2025 for Affidavit of Service.
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 13-02-2025

Date: 13-02-2025
Business: CORAM - H.H.J. SHRI. R. B. PARVEKAR-(C.R.NO.59)
None for plaintiff.
Adv.Arpita Palvankar filed vakalatnama on behalf of defendant No.3 T.O.R marked as Exh-6.  Order-Filed.
Plaintiff to serve copy of plaint and all documents to the defendant No.3 on or before next date.
Issue writ of summons through court bailiff to defendant Nos.1 and 2 for settlement of issues and for filing written statement within 30days from the date of receipts.
Matter is adj to 24/07/2025 for affidavit of service/compliance.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 24-07-2025

Date: 24-07-2025
Business: Po is on leave
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2025

Date: 16-10-2025
Business: Court is vacant.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2026

Date: 29-01-2026
Business: Court is vacant.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2026

Date: 26-03-2026
Business: Court is vacant.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2026

Date: 13-07-2026
Business: CORAM - H.H.J. SMT. P. M. KATHARE-(C.R.NO.59)
Adv.P. S. Bankar i/b M.V. Kini and Company for plaintiff present and filed vakalatnama. T.O.R marked as Exh-7.  Order- Seen and filed.
Adv.Aarpeeta Paanvalkar i/b Renata Partners for defendant No.3 present.
Matter is adj to 24/09/2026 for affidavit of service.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2026

Date: 24-09-2026
Business: CORAM - H.H.J. SMT. P. M. KATHARE-(C.R.NO.59)
Adv.Maya Dave for plaintiff present.
Adv.Pranjal Sahu i/b Renata Partners LLP for defendant No.3 present.
Plaintiff is directed to serve copy of plaint and compilation of documents to the defendant No.3.
Plaintiff is directed to take steps against defendant Nos.1 and 2.
Matter is adj to 16/02/2027 for taking steps by plaintiff against defendant Nos.1 and 2 and written statement of defendant No.3.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100459/2020
Filing Date: 10-01-2020
Court Number And Judge: 59-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    03 Nov 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 03/11/2022
St. No.
459/20
CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI V.D. KEDAR, JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,
GR.MUMBAI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Till date the plaintiff failed to remove office objection. Already notice
to that effect is displayed on board and thereby directed the plaintiff
to remove the office objection. However the plaintiff failed to do so. It
reveals that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Hence it stands disposed off. Suit be registered for statistical purpose.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    03 Nov 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 03/11/2022
St. No.
459/20
CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI V.D. KEDAR, JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,
GR.MUMBAI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Till date the plaintiff failed to remove office objection. Already notice
to that effect is displayed on board and thereby directed the plaintiff
to remove the office objection. However the plaintiff failed to do so. It
reveals that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Hence it stands disposed off. Suit be registered for statistical purpose.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.