Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Shakuntala Narendra JoshiVsShri. Jairam C. Pethe - deceased 1a. Shaileja Jairam Pethe and Ors.

CNR MHCC0100041220209-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 29th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100042/2020
Registration Date
10 Jan 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-01-2020
    Business: PO IS ON LEAVE.
    Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
    Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2020
    
    Date: 29-01-2020
    Business: Adv.Shety for plaintiff present and filed Registered Chamber Summons no.42/2020 for chamber summons reply.
    L.O.
    Adv.Prerana Dhoke for plaintiff present.
    No one present on behalf of defendants and such reply to Chs/s.No.42/2020 is not filed.
    Order in Chs/s.No.42/2020.
    ORDER
    This Ch/s. is taken out by Plaintiff for condoning the delay caused in bringing on record the LRs of deceased defendant no.10 who is reported to be dead on 07/09/2018.  Plaintiff has further prayed for setting  aside abatement order against defendant no.10 and for allowing the amendment in the plaint for bringing Lrs of deceased defendant no.10 on record. As mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of Ch/s. it becomes clear that plaintiff came to know in the 1st week of December, 2019 about the death of defendant no.10 when son of defendant no.10 informed plaintiff by telephone about it. Thereafter immediately plaintiff has taken out this Ch/s.
    As defendants have not resisted the Ch/s. and as plaintiff got the knowledge of death of defendant no.10 in the 1st Week of December 2019 I find that plaintiff has made out reasonable ground to condone the delay  caused in filing this Ch/s.  Further, this suit being the suit for declaration that plaintiff has share in the suit property, I find that unless Lrs of deceased defendant no.10 are brought on record, I find that the effective adjudication of plaintiff\''s claim  cannot  be made. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
    ORDER
    1)   Ch/s.No.42/2020 is made absolute in terms of prayers clauses
           (a) to (c).
    2)   Plaintiff to carry out proposed amendment in the plaint within stipulated time provided by law.
    3)  Plaintiff to serve copy of amended plaint upon the newly impleaded LRs of deceased defendant no.10.
    4)    Plaintiff to file typed copy of amended plaint for the record of the Court.
    Case is adjourned to 11/02/2020 for compliance.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 29-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100433/2020
    Filing Date: 10-01-2020
    First Hearing Date: 18th January 2020
    Decision Date: 29th January 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    29 Jan 2020

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: HAMBER SUMMONS/0100042/2020 Shakuntala Narendra Joshi Vs Shri. Jairam C. Pethe - deceased 1a. Shaileja Jairam Pethe and Ors. Date : 29-01-2020 Business : Adv.Shety for plaintiff present and filed Registered Chamber Summons no.42/2020 for chamber summons reply. L.O. Adv.Prerana Dhoke for plaintiff present. No one present on behalf of defendants and such reply to Chs/s.No.42/2020 is not filed. Order in Chs/s.No.42/2020. ORDER This Ch/s. is taken out by Plaintiff for condoning the delay caused in…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.