Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Indubai W- o Ramchandra KakadeVsRanjana Vilas Kakade And ors

CNR MHCC0100041020194-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 07th February 2019

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100060/2019
Registration Date
11 Jan 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-01-2019
    Business: Adv. for plff. present.
    deft. and his adv. absent.
    As court is busy in dictating judgment in old suit No.3696/08 Matter is adjd. to. 07.02.2019 for hearing on Ch/sum No.60/19
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 07-02-2019
    
    Date: 07-02-2019
    Business: Adv. for plff. present.
    deft. and his adv. absent.
                        ORDER ON CH/SUM NO.60/19
           The instant Ch/sum is taken out by the DH/applicant of E.A. to direct the in-charge of Chembur Police Station to remove the deft. in person claiming through the defts. and causing obstructions in the execution of the decree and if necessary to put them to Civil Prison to enable the Bailiff to handover the vacant and peaceful possession of suit property to the DH/applicant by breaking open a law if any. The earlier report of bailiff in respect of the possession warrant issued by this Court under decree appears to be to the effect that when the bailiff went to execute the possession warrant pursuant to the decree under execution, the defts. informed the bailiff that their relatives namely Smt. Sujata Dodake, Pankaj Kamble also resided there and the said relatives refused to vacate the premises and thus they obstructed the execution of the possession warrant. Bailiff report is also to the effect that the defts. gave undertaking that they will vacate the suit premises after 15 days in presence of police officials and therefore the bailiff has a requested to issue Writ Under 21 Rule 35 of CPC and also to give directions for removing the third part if any, by taking help of police. In such circumstances it appears that the obstruction to the execution of the decree has been noticed by the bailiff and therefore plff. will have to take appropriate steps by making necessary application to the court for removal of the said obstruction. In these circumstances, the Ch/sum No.60/19 is dismissed with liberty to the plff. to take appropriate steps for removal of the obstructions by making necessary application to the court.
    Matter is adjd. to. 27.02.2019 for steps by plff/DH
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 07-02-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100296/2019
    Filing Date: 11-01-2019
    First Hearing Date: 25th January 2019
    Decision Date: 07th February 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    07 Feb 2019

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 4 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0100060/2019 Indubai W- o Ramchandra Kakade Vs Ranjana Vilas Kakade And ors Date : 07-02-2019 Business : Adv. for plff. present. deft. and his adv. absent. ORDER ON CH/SUM NO.60/19 The instant Ch/sum is taken out by the DH/applicant of E.A. to direct the in-charge of Chembur Police Station to remove the deft. in person claiming through the defts. and causing obstructions in…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.