Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

M/s. MZ Audio Distributions (Inida)VsMs. Saachi Innowaytech

CNR MHCC01000405201920-COURT 20 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 22nd April 2019

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100059/2019
Registration Date
10 Jan 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-01-2019
    Business: Already adj. 25/01/2019.
    Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2019
    
    Date: 25-01-2019
    Business: Adv. Santosh Maske Present for the Plff.
    None is present for the Deft.
    Ld. Counsel for the Plff tendered registered chamber summons No. 59/19 along with affidavit. t.o.r.
    Ld. Counsel for Plff sought time for filing service affidavit of chamber summons.
    Matter is kept for service affidavit of chamber summons on 27/02/2019.
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2019
    
    Date: 27-02-2019
    Business: PO relived for mediation training at West Bengal Judicial Academy  Calcutta afternoon. Hence matter adj.
    Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 22-04-2019
    
    Date: 22-04-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Shashikala Mahamuni Present for the Plff.
    None Present for the Deft.
    Ld counsel for the plff filed affidavit of service of CS 59/19. t.o.r.
    As per service affidavit deft served CS 59/19 by way of RPAD as per postal acknowledgement refused. Hence deft deliberately avoiding service. Therefore CS 59/19 proceeded without reply. Heard Ld counsel for the plff on CS 59/19.
    Hence following order of CS 59/19 passed.
    Heard. None appeared for deft who refused to take service of CS as per service affidavit. Hence CS as prayed needs to be made absolute for determination of the question involved in this suit. There is no harms or prejudice to otherside. Due diligence shown hence CS is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a) by condoning delay, as per schedule attached to CS. Amendment be carried out within 14 days. Amended copy be placed on record. No order to costs. Case paper be filed.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 22-04-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100447/2019
    Filing Date: 10-01-2019
    First Hearing Date: 17th January 2019
    Decision Date: 22nd April 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 20-COURT 20 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    22 Apr 2019
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 20 ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0100059/2019
    M/s. MZ Audio Distributions (Inida) Vs Ms. Saachi Innowaytech
    Date : 22-04-2019
    Business : Adv. Ms. Shashikala Mahamuni Present for the Plff. None
    Present for the Deft. Ld counsel for the plff filed affidavit of
    service of CS 59/19. t.o.r. As per service affidavit deft
    served CS 59/19 by way of RPAD as per postal
    acknowledgement refused. Hence deft deliberately avoiding
    service. Therefore CS 59/19 proceeded without reply. Heard
    Ld counsel for the plff on CS 59/19. Hence following order
    of CS 59/19 passed. Heard. None appeared for deft who
    refused to take service of CS as per service affidavit. Hence
    CS as prayed needs to be made absolute for determination of
    the question involved in this suit. There is no harms or
    prejudice to otherside. Due diligence shown hence CS is
    made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a) by condoning
    delay, as per schedule attached to CS. Amendment be
    carried out within 14 days. Amended copy be placed on
    record. No order to costs. Case paper be filed.
    Nature of Disposal : ALLOWED
    Disposal Date : 22-04-2019
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.