SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Devendra Kishanlal DagliyaVsMCGM
CNR MHCC0100037920196-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 11th January 2019
TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100101/2019
- Registration Date
- 11 Jan 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
- 1MCGM
Acts & Sections
1Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 35 · 36
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 11-01-2019 Business: By precipe. Advocate Mr. S. K. Dubey for plaintiff present and filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Kumawat for deft./MMC present with officer Ms.Anchal Gunjal (JE, B and F Dept, G/south). Heard both the sides on draft NM. Plaintiff has challenged the notice u/s 354-A of MMC Act. Admittedly plaintiff has given reply to the notice. However, till today no speaking order is passed. Therefore, defendant corporation is directed to consider the reply and documents filed by plaintiff and then pass speaking order. Plaintiff is at liberty to file additional reply within two weeks from today. Till then and In case of adverse order two weeks thereafter, defendant is directed not to take any coercive action in respect of the suit premises.. Suit and draft NM disposed of accordingly. Draft NM be registered for statistical purpose. Proceeding is closed. Nature Of Disposal: OTHER Disposal Date: 11-01-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100444/2019 Filing Date: 10-01-2019 First Hearing Date: 11th January 2019 Decision Date: 11th January 2019 Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 111 Jan 2019
11 Jan 2019
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100101/2019 Devendra Kishanlal Dagliya Vs MCGM Date : 11-01-2019 Business : By precipe. Advocate Mr. S. K. Dubey for plaintiff present and filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Kumawat for deft./MMC present with officer Ms.Anchal Gunjal (JE, B and F Dept, G/south). Heard both the sides on draft NM. Plaintiff has challenged the notice u/s 354-A of MMC Act. Admittedly plaintiff has given reply to the notice. However, till today no speaking order is passed. Therefore, defendant corporation is directed to consider the reply and documents filed by plaintiff and then pass speaking order. Plaintiff is at liberty to file additional reply within two weeks from today. Till then and In case of adverse order two weeks thereafter, defendant is directed not to take any coercive action in respect of the suit premises.. Suit and draft NM disposed of accordingly. Draft NM be registered for statistical purpose. Proceeding is closed. Nature of Disposal : OTHER Disposal Date : 11-01-2019 COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
