Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

GANGARAM MALKU GADGEVsDAYAVAN DNYANU SARTAPE

CNR MHCC010003282018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 13th December 2018

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100517/2017
Registration Date
28 Nov 2017

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 23-01-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  None for Defendant.
    Mr. Jain prays for Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC without notice u/o. XXI R. 22 as the Execution is within 2 years of the Decree.  Issue warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC, returnable on 23/04/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2018
    
    Date: 23-04-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of shri. Jain adjd. 28/06/2018 for return of warrant.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2018
    
    Date: 28-06-2018
    Business: Parties and Advocates absent, adjourned to 29/08/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2018
    
    Date: 29-08-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  For return of warrant, adjd to 31/10/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 31-10-2018
    
    Date: 31-10-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  On request of Mr. Jain, adjd to 13/12/2018 for filing service report of warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2018
    
    Date: 13-12-2018
    Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present.  Shri Jain states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 23/01/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 13-12-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100258/2018
    Filing Date: 22-11-2017
    First Hearing Date: 23rd January 2018
    Decision Date: 13th December 2018
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.