EXECUTION APPLN
MESS. OTARMAL KANTILAL AND CO.VsYESHWANT JAYWANT AWCHITE AND ANR.
CNR MHCC010003192018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 25th October 2018
TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100552/2017
- Registration Date
- 19 Dec 2017
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 29-01-2018 Business: Parties and Advocates absent. Hence, adjourned to 06/02/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2018 Date: 06-02-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjourned to 20/02/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2018 Date: 20-02-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Hence adjourned to 21/03/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2018 Date: 21-03-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjourned to 02/04/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 02-04-2018 Date: 02-04-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjourned to 02/05/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2018 Date: 02-05-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjd. to 27/07/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2018 Date: 27-07-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 01/09/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-09-2018 Date: 01-09-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 25/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 25-10-2018 Date: 25-10-2018 Business: Mr. Dileep Satale I/b Mr. Navin/Ms. Najafiya, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Satale prays for issue of warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC, without issue of notice, as the Exe.Applilcation is filed within two year of passing Decree. Hence, issue warrant as prayed for in the Exe.Application and as the prayer of the Exe.Application is allowed, the same stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, Warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE Disposal Date: 25-10-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100253/2018 Filing Date: 19-12-2017 First Hearing Date: 29th January 2018 Decision Date: 25th October 2018 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
