Order 1

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 1 Ad.Int - NM 132-2020 in St.No.201-2020
IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY
AT MUMBAI.
ORDER ON AD INTERIM RELIEF ON
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 132 of 2020
(CNR no. MHCC010003172020)
IN
STAMP No.201 OF 2020
NOOR MOHAMMED ABDUL QAYYUM
Aged 53 years, Occ: Business,
Indian Inhabitant, residing at
Road No.A1, 90 feet road,
near Bus Depot, Saint Nirankari
Nagar, Baiganwadi, Shivaji Nagar,
Govandi, Mumbai 400 043 ]... Plaintiff
Versus
1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF
GREATER MUMBAI, a Body
incorporated under the Mumbai
Municipal Corporation Act, having
its office at Mahapalika Bhavan,
Mahapalika Marg, Fort, Mumbai
400 001.
2. The Assistant Municipal Commissioner,
M/East ward, Mumbai Municipal Corporation,
M.T. Kadam Marg, Govandi (W)
Mumbai400043 ]....Defendants
Appearances:
Ld. Advocate Mr. Wasim Khan for the Plaintiff.
Ld. APP Mrs. Hajare for defendant/MCGM.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI U.J.MORE
(Court Room no. 8)
DATED : 10th January, 2020
-- 1 of 5 --
2 Ad.Int - NM 132-2020 in St.No.201-2020
O R A L O R D E R O N A D I N T E R I M R E L I E F
1. Perused NM, Plaint, Documents, Photographs produced by
the plaintiff and heard both sides. The plaintiffs, occupants of different
structures/premises at Room No.MEM/95/NN/A1, situated at 90 feed
road, Saint Nirankari Nagar Near Bus Depot, Baiganwadi, Govandi,
Mumbai400043, are under apprehension that the officers of defendant
No.1 MCGM will demolish the structures without following due process
of law. Ld. Adv. for defendant No.1 MCGM has strongly objected stating
that description of the suit structure is not properly given in the plaint
and the plaintiffs or other persons may take disadvantage of the order
of this Court, if granted. After going through the document such as
electricity bills, Adhar cards, ration card, election identity cards of the
plaintiffs they are in occupation of their premises.
2. Heard both the sides.
3. The impugned notice bearing No. KSA/M
East/20/2/JN/S.A(Zone1 dated 4.07.2019. Which challenged by the
plaintiff. The plaintiff place reliance on copies of Ration card, Shop and
establishment certificate. It is submitted by the Ld. Advocate of the
plaintiff that, the owner of "Notice premises" which started by
-- 2 of 5 --
3 Ad.Int - NM 132-2020 in St.No.201-2020
Zopadpatti identity card receipt dated 29.07.2000 in the name of
plaintiff and the pitch card (Zopadpatti pass No. 1665949). He also
place reliance on the receipt of Election Voters card No.14427 on these
ground the MCGM Lawyer strongly objected to these documents.
4. Ld. Advocate for the defendant argued that the corporation
has started proposed plan of constructing common Toilets in the area.
In the area of Saint Nirankari Nagar ward No. 134 under the cleaning
India mission(Lot 11R) and the plaintiff has illegally constructed the
"Notice Premises" without any permission from the corporation. I have
gone through the documents filed by the both the sides. It transpires the
Notice under section 314 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act1888 was
issued to the plaintiff.
5. The plaintiff has denying all the allegations and claim with
suit premises is residential cum commercial premises about 38 Square
meters started in room No.3. The documents filed by the plaintiff that
the pitch card and the assessment of Rs. 14,400/ no where transpires
that he is permitted any type of construction for "Notice Premises". The
plaintiff failed to file any documentary proof to show that the
construction is protected under the Slum Act or it is in existence prior to
-- 3 of 5 --
4 Ad.Int - NM 132-2020 in St.No.201-2020
01.01.2000.
6. It transpires that corporation after giving hearing to the
plaintiff pass the allowed official annexure to alongwith dated
26.11.2019 which transpires that the suit "Notice Premises" is illegible.
Which is also supported by the panchnama cum notice dated
30.11.2019 by defendant which is signed by plaintiffs son Abu Zafar. In
short prima facie it is not a case of a Adinterim injunction considering
documents filed by the both sides. Hence, I proceed to pass following
order.
ORDER
Adinterim relief is rejected.
(U.J.More)
Judge,
Date : 10.01.2020 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai.
Dictated on : 10.01.2020
Transcribed on : 10.01.2020
Signed by HHJ on : 10.01.2020
-- 4 of 5 --
5 Ad.Int - NM 132-2020 in St.No.201-2020
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 13.01.2020 at 12.45 p.m.
NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mr.G.R.Suryawanshi
Name of the Judge (With Court
Room no.)
HHJ Shri. U.J.More
C.R. no.08
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
10/01/2020
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by
P.O. on
10/01/2020
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded
on
13/01/2020
-- 5 of 5 --