Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Shri Pankaj Champaklal MehtaVsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100031420188-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 15th January 2018

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100523/2018
Registration Date
10 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Shri Pankaj Champaklal Mehta

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-01-2018
Business: Adv.Mr.P.D.Gandhi for Plff.present.
Adv.Mr.Kumawat for BMC/Deft.present.
Mr.Swapnil S. Sanaf , Jr.Engineer is present.
Order below draft N/m.
Perused N/m which is supported by an affidavit.  Also perused documents on record.  Today before the Court Jr.Engineer Mr.Swapnil S.Sanaf is present.  The plff is also present before the court.  Heard Ld.adv.of both the sides. In the present case, the plff has challenged the notice under section 53(1) of MRTP Act.  Without going to the merit of this case, it is submitted on behalf of the plff that the plff will be submitting the application for regularization of the so called unauthorized structure. Under these circumstances, it is directed that plff to move the application before the concerned authority for regularization within one month.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 15-01-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 100333/2018
Filing Date: 08-01-2018
First Hearing Date: 15th January 2018
Decision Date: 15th January 2018
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    15 Jan 2018

    Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 8 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100523/2018 Shri Pankaj Champaklal Mehta Vs MCGM Date : 15-01-2018 Exhibits : Concerned authority to decide the regularization proposal as per the Law. The concerned authority to communicate about the out come of the regularization proposal to the plff. If the adverse order is passed then no coercive action be taken with regard to notice structure for period of two…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.