Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mrs. Shama Yusuf ShaikhVsShri Akhtar Mohamed Ilyas +2 more

CNR MHCC0100031020192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 29th January 2019

TrustJury record updated 17 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100119/2019
Registration Date
09 Jan 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

4

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 09-01-2019
Business: Defendant No.1 present.
None present for plaintiff.
KB
L.O.
Adv. R.P.Singh for Defendant present.
He tendered registered NM no.119/19 t.o.r.
Copy of NM be served on other side.
Adj for service to 29.01.2019.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2019

Date: 29-01-2019
Business: Adv. Salunkhe for Defendant no.1 present.
Adv. Shukla for Plaintiff present.
Say filed by Adv for Plaintiff on NM No.119/19.
Order below NM No.119/19.
Perused Notice of Motion, affidavit in support of it and say of Plaintiff. Heard respective counsel for parties. Present Notice of Motion is taken out by Defendant no.1 for condoning delay in filing written statement and allowing him to file written statement. It is contended that Defendant no.1 tried to settle the dispute as it was between the family members so he could not approach his Advocate to file written statement in above matter. He approached his present Advocate who prepared his written statement on 04.04.2018 and same is verified and affirmed by him on 05.04.2018 but it could not be taken on record as delay has been caused to file the same. Thereafter, he was bed ridden and advised by Doctor to take complete bed rest. In above circumstances, Defendant no.1 has made prayer in above terms. Plaintiff has opposed motion on the count that it does not disclose sufficient cause and is not supported by documents. It appears that writ of summons has been served upon Defendant no.1 on 29.01.2018. He ought to have file written statement within 30 days from date of service of summons but he failed to do so. Alongwith motion written statement is filed to show that verification has been made by Defendant no.1 on 05.04.2018 i.e. within the period of outer limit of 90 days from the date of service of summons. It shows bonafide on his parts. Considering above facts and that reason assigned by the Defendant no.1 are sufficient to condone the delay caused in filing of written statement. Hence pass following order.
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion no.119/19 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to Plaintiff and made absolute in terms of prayer clause A subject to payment of cost.
2. On payment of cost written statement be taken on record.
Cost paid by Defendant no.1 to Plaintiff.
Ex.3 Written statement filed by Defendant no.1 t.o.r.
Adj for issues to 19.03.2019.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 29-01-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100406/2019
Filing Date: 09-01-2019
First Hearing Date: 09th January 2019
Decision Date: 29th January 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
29 Jan 2019

Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 29.01.2019 SU 143/18 @ NM 119/19 Exh.3 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Salunkhe for Defendant no.1 present. Adv. Shukla for Plaintiff present. Say filed by Adv for Plaintiff on NM No.119/19. Order below NM No.119/19. Perused Notice of Motion, affidavit in support of it and say of Plaintiff. Heard respective counsel for parties. Present Notice of Motion is taken out by Defendant no.1 for condoning delay in filing written statement and…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.