Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01000298201916 Jan 2020
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 16 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010002982019

Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement
Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT NO. 183/2019 1
Received on : 07012019
Registered on : 24012019
Decided on : 16012020
Duration : 01Y 0M 11D
IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 183 OF 2019
(UNDER ORDER XXXVII THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908)
( CNR NO.: MHCC010002982019)
Mrs.Nalini Santosh Madgunde
Age :31years, Occupation: Carrying
on Money lending Business, in the
name of Nalini Santosh Madgunde
Under licence No.RBE 1343,
Residence and Office address at
Room No.2, Behind Shop Line,
First floor, Building No.4,
Wadia Estate, Near Radhadevi
Dispensary Bail Bazar,
Kurla(W), Mumbai400 070. ....Plaintiff
Versus
Mrs. Pradnya Prakash Pawar
of Chembur Mumbai
Age:55 years, Occupation:Service
Residing at Jai Bhavani Chawl,
Chikhal Wadi, Near Priyadarshan
Building, Chembur,
Mumbai400 071,
Office address at Malwani
Township Manapa School,
Malad(West), Mumbai. ...Defendant
Appearances:
Advocate Mr.B.S.Patil for the Plaintiff.
Defendant Exparte.
-- 1 of 4 --
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 183/2019 2
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT
(C.R.NO.28)
DATE : 16TH JANUARY 2020
J U D G M E N T
1. This is Summary Suit for recovery of amount of Rs.2,07,100/
(Rupees Two Lakh Seven Thousand and One Hundred Only) with
interest at the rate of 18% p.a..
2. According to the plaintiff, in consideration of Rs.1,90,000/
obtained by the defendant from the plaintiff, the defendant executed
promissory note of same amount on 12.06.2018 in favour of the
plaintiff. By same promissory note the defendant promised to pay
interest at the rate of 18% p.a. on the said sum of Rs.1,90,000/.
However, the defendant neglected to pay the said amount. Despite
service of legal notice of demand dated 19.11.2018, the defendant
failed to pay the said amount. At the institution of the suit, the amount
due and payable by the defendant was Rs.2,07,100/. Therefore, the
plaintiff claimed decree for recovery of said amount with the interest.
3. Despite service of summons the defendant failed to appear.
Therefore, the suit proceeded exparte against the Defendant.
4. Considering the material on record and submissions made on
behalf of the plaintiff points arise for determination along with my
findings thereon for the reasons recorded are as under:
-- 2 of 4 --
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 183/2019 3
POINTS FINDINGS
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled
to recovery of the amount with
interest as prayed?
Affirmative
2. What order & decree? As per final order
REASONS
AS TO POINTS NO.1 & 2:
5. The plaintiff filed her Claim Affidavit at Exh.7 and also produced
documents with list Exh.8. The Affidavit and the document as
promissory note dtd.12.06.2018 reveal that the defendant executed said
promissory note for Rs.1,90,000/ in favour of the plaintiff and also
promised to pay interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. Copy of license in Form
No.3 shows that the plaintiff is licensed Money Lender. Despite legal
notice dtd.19.11.2018, the defendant failed to pay the amount to the
plaintiff. Thus, the claim affidavit, documents on record and the
circumstance that defendant failed to appear and contest/challenge the
suit, proved the case of the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled
to recovery of the amount with interest as prayed. Hence, point No.1 is
answered in the Affirmative. In view of Para499 of Civil Manual court
fees has to be refunded to the plaintiff, this being summary suit where
the defendant did not appear. In answer to point No.2 order as follows
is passed:
ORDER
1. The suit is exparte decreed with costs as under.
2. The Defendant shall pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs.2,07,100/
(Rupees Two Lakh Seven Thousand and One Hundred Only) with
-- 3 of 4 --
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 183/2019 4
simple interest at the rate of 18% p.a. on principal amount of
Rs.1,90,000/ from the date of suit till realization of the amount.
3. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules.
4. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
(Deepak L. Bhagwat)
AdHoc Judge,
Date: 16/01/2020 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai
Dictated on : 16/01/2020
Transcribed on : 20/01/2020
Signed on : 20/01/2020
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED
JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
22/01/2020 at 2.10p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.D.L.Bhagwat
(C.R.NO.28)
Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 16/01/2020
Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 20/01/2020
Judgment/Order uploaded on 22/01/2020
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.