Mr. Ashwin Laxmichand DaulatVsMCGM

Date: 16-01-2018
Business: Plff.Adv.Mr.Kudalkar for Plff.present.
Adv.Mrs.Kamble for BMC/Deft.present.
Adv.for Plff.filed rejoinder t.o.r.  Copy served to other side.
Order below N/m No.130/2018
Perused N/m, reply and documents on record.  Heard Ld.Advocates of both the sides.  In the case in hand, it is not the allegations of the MCGM that the shop itself is not unauthorized.  The allegations is that there is unauthorized horizontal extension in front of the existing shop by using bricks masonry wall, wooden and M S material etc.with G.I.Sheet roof.  The MCGM has filed on record the copy of sanctioned plan which prima facie shows about existence of  wall.  In the midst of the argument, the plff has made a statement that for the notice structure he is ready to make an application for regularization of the same.  Hence, at this stage, on the statement made by the plff and his advocate, no purpose would be served in keeping this Notice of Motion and Suit pending.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 16-01-2018

Filing Number: 100308/2018
Filing Date: 08-01-2018
First Hearing Date: 16th January 2018
Decision Date: 16th January 2018
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE