Date: 22-01-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. M. A. Khan for Plaintiff present
Advocate Aditya Khanna for Defendant no.2 present
Advocate Ballal Zatakia for Defendant no.3 present and filed vakalatnama for Defendant no.3, t.o.r.
Court is busy in hearing Hon\''ble High Court time bound Notice of Motions in suit no.627/13 case is adjourned to 23/01/2020.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 23-01-2020
Date: 23-01-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. M. A. Khan for Plaintiff present and filed registered Notice of Motion no.295/2020 with affidavit in support, t.o.r. He also filed rejoinder to Notice of Motion no.295/2020, t.o.r.
Advocate Mr. Aditya Khanna for Defendant no.2 present and filed vakalatnama, t.o.r. and marked as Exh.3 He also filed reply to Notice of Motion no.295/2020, t.o.r.
Advocate Mr. Nadim Malik for Defendant no.3 filed reply to Notice of Motion no.295/2020, t.o.r.
Heard Plaintiff\''s advocate who has referred agreement executed by Defendant no.1 in favour of Plaintiff which is at page no.53 of plaint. He also referred agreement executed by Defendant no.2 in favour of Defendant no.3. It is contended that Plaintiff has paid all consideration of suit flat however Defendant no.2 has executed agreement in favour of Defendant no.3 in respect of the suit premises and thereby Defendant no.2 has decided to handover possession of suit flat to Defendant no.3 by discarding Plaintiff\''s right which are created on the basis of agreement executed by Defendant no.1 developer. It is submitted that suit flat was the flat kept for sale by the builder and not for the alternate accommodation of the tenants. Plaintiff advocate also referred the list contending it to be the list issued by MHADA under RTI Act in which the name of Defendant no.3 is appearing at serial no.5 and it is mentioned in said list that room no.1 from 6th floor was proposed to be allotted to Defendant no.3. On perusal of alleged list, it is noticed by the court that there is nothing to believe that said list is issued by MHADA under RTI Act, because Plaintiff has not filed any document to show that he has filed any application under RTI Act with MHADA and in response to it, MHADA has issued the alleged list. Plaintiff is directed to satisfy the court as to how the list can be considered by the court as the list issued by MHADA under RTI Act for that purpose Plaintiff will have to file copy of application filed by Plaintiff under RTI Act and the letter with which alleged list was given by MHADA to Plaintiff under RTI Act. Further, on perusal of the plaint, court has noticed that Plaintiff has prayed for declaration that agreement between Defendant nos.2 and 3 is null and void and Plaintiff has also prayed for decree of possession of suit flat against Defendant no.1. However, after giving serious considering to the submissions made by Plaintiff, court is of the opinion that unless Plaintiff claims relief of specific performance of the alleged agreement executed by Defendant no.1 in favour of Plaintiff, no such relief for possession of suit flat can be claimed by Plaintiff. It is made clear that if Plaintiff desires, Plaintiff may amend the plaint for claiming relief of specific performance of agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant no.1. According to Plaintiff\''s advocate Notice of Motion is necessary to be made absolute at least in terms of prayer clause (b) of the Notice of Motion.
No one present for Defendant no.1.
Advocate for Defendant no.2 who has referred page no.118 of plaint i.e. clause 20 of the agreement between Defendant no.2 and Defendant no.1. Advocate for Defendant no.2 also referred para no.6 of the plaint and para no.18 of the plaint. It is submitted that Plaintiff is claiming the rights from Defendant no.1 on the basis of agreement between Defendant nos.1 and 2 however, Plaintiff has contended in para no.6 that Defendant no.1 has not disclosed the fact that Defendant no.1 has redeveloped said building by demolishing the old structure occupied by 50 tenants. Advocate for Defendant no.2 further, submitted that agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant no.1 is showing the fact that building has disclosed t he fact that he has redeveloped the property by demolishing old building. Admittedly, Plaintiff has contended that he has paid Rs.64 lacs as consideration of suit flat however Plaintiff has valued his suit for recovery of possession of said flat to Rs.45,90,800/-. Thus according to advocate for Defendant no.2 Plaintiff has undervalued his claim. Lastly advocate for Defendant no.2 submitted that that Plaintiff is not executant of the agreement between Defendant nos.1 and 2 hence Plaintiff can not pray for cancellation of said agreement and Plaintiff only can claim that said agreement is not binding upon him, however Plaintiff has not made any such prayer, on this ground also the prayer as paid in Notice of Motion can not be granted.
Advocate for Defendant no.3 referred para no.7 of the plaint and he has also referred the supplementary agreement executed between Defendant nos.1 and 2 which is annexed to the reply of Defendant no.2. He referred page nos.25 to 31 of the reply of Defendant no.2 and pointed out that name of Plaintiff is not mentioned by developer Defendant no.1 as the purchaser of any flat from the building developed by the developer. Adv for Defendant no.3 also referred the letter of allotment issued by Defendant no.1 in favour of Defendant no.3, said letter is allegedly dated 08/02/2013 and according to advocate for Defendant no.3 by said letter flat no.1 from 10th floor of newly constructed building is agreed to be allotted to Defendant no.3. On perusal of letter dated 08/02/2013 it is noticed by the court that the xerox copy of the fresh document and not of the old document which was prepared before 7 years. Hence, Defendant no.3 is directed to produce before the court the copy of alleged letter dated 08/02/2013 given by Defendant no.12 to Defendant no.3. Adv for Defendant no.3 referred the alleged list of MHADA which is produced by Plaintiff along with affidavit of rejoinder. Adv for Defendant no.3 pointed out that name of Smt. Saeeda daughter of Naziruddin is shown at serial no.19 of said list and said list further shows that flat no.1 from 10th floor was proposed to be allotted to said lady. It is submitted that said flat no.1 from 10th floor is the suit property, hence according to Adv for Defendant no.3 Plaintiff can not have the reliefs as prayed in Notice of Motion on the basis of list produced by Plaintiff himself.
After hearing the arguments, it is noticed by me that Plaintiff has sought declaration that the agreement between Defendant nos.2 and 3 is null and void however Plaintiff has not challenged supplementary agreement executed between Defendant nos.1 and 2 on 27/08/2019. Plaintiff\''s advocate submitted that said agreement is brought to the notice of Plaintiff yesterday when Defendant no.2 filed reply to the Notice of Motion. Any how, as on today Plaintiff is having knowledge about said agreement hence to establish Plaintiffs rights properly Plaintiff will have to seek declaration that said agreement is not binding upon Plaintiff. From the document filed by Plaintiff itself it becomes clear that lady namely Smt. Saeeda daughter of Naziruddin was supposed to get allotment of room no.1 from 10th floor of suit building hence Plaintiff will have to take necessary steps to add said lady in this suit as Defendant and unless Plaintiff takes any such steps no orders in the matter can be passed because if such orders will be passed they will affect the right of Smt.Saeeda daughter of Naziruddin. As such arguments heard.
Case is adjourned to 24/01/2020 for Order on Notice of Motion no.295/20.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2020
Date: 24-01-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. M. A. Khan for Plaintiff present
Advocate Mr. Aditya Khanna for Defendant no.2 present
Advocate Mr. Malhar for Defendant no.3
F.R.S.R. following order has passed-
ORDER
Notice of Motion no.295 of 2020 stands disposed off/dismissed.
Parties act upon authenticated copy of this roznama.
Case is adjourned to 15/04/2020 for service of writ of summons/Written Statement.
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2020
Date: 15-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 22-04-2020
Date: 22-04-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2020
Date: 02-06-2020
Business: Case is adjd.to 19.06.20 in view of extension of Lockdown period as per office order no.78/20 dtd.18.05.20
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 19-06-2020
Date: 19-06-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020
Date: 17-08-2020
Business: Adjourned due to Covid -19.
Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2020
Date: 05-10-2020
Business: Adv. Shri. M. A. Khan for plaintiff present and requested for extension of time to serve the Ch/s. time granted.
None present for Defendants.
Due to Corona pandemic, it seems that parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 23/11/2020 for Ch/s. reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-11-2020
Date: 23-11-2020
Business: None present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. Nadim Malik Present for Defendant No. 3.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 28/01/2021 for C/S Reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2021
Date: 28-01-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Ramesh i/b M.A. Khan for plff present and tendered registered CS No.584/2020 along with affidavit in support. He also filed affidavit of service of said Ch/s on defendant. The returned postal envelope annexed to the affidavit of service shows that notice was sent by RPAD to deft No.1 on some other address then the address mentioned in the title clause of Ch/s. Likewise, the postal envelope containing notice sent to deft No.3 bears endorsement of postal dept as not known. Apparently, deft nos.1 and 3 are not served properly. Plff to take steps to serve defts Nos.1 and 3 properly with Ch/s No.584/2020. Deft No.2 and respondent are properly served hence, Ch/s No.584/2020 be kept for reply of deft No.2 and respondent.
Matter is adjourned for reply of deft No.2 and respondent to Ch/s No.584/2020 and for taking steps by the pflf to serve deft No.1 and 3 with said Ch/s to 15.02.2021.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2021
Date: 15-02-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Ramesh Mandal h/f Adv Mr. M.A. Khan for plff present and seeks time to file affidavit of service of Ch/s on deft Nos.1 and 3.
O- Time granted till next date.
Deft No.2 failed to file reply to Ch/s No.584/2020 hence, said Ch/s to proceed without reply of deft No.2.
Matter is adjd. for compliance to 28.04.2021.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2021
Date: 28-04-2021
Business: due to Covid-19 matter adjourned to
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2021
Date: 28-04-2021
Business: due to Covid-19 matter adjourned to
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2021
Date: 23-07-2021
Business: Court is on Leave.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 02-09-2021
Date: 02-09-2021
Business: Adv Ms. Dipti Mehta for plff present and seeks time to file affidavit of service of ch/s on deft Nos.1 and 3 . O-Time granted till next date.
None present for deft.
Matter is adjd. for affidavit of service to 11.10.2021.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2021
Date: 11-10-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Mandal present for plff. and seeks adjournment to serve deft No.2 properly with the Ch/s.
Adv Ms. Shukla for deft No.3 present and seeks time to file reply by giving oral undertaking that she will file vakalatnama on behalf of deft No.3 on next date. Her oral undertaking is accepted
Matter is adjd. for reply and Ch/s service to 16.12.2021.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2021
Date: 16-12-2021
Business: None present for plff.
Adv Mr. Mishra present for deft.
As nobody is present for the plff and as court is busy in other matter, this matter is adjd. for Ch/s reply to 10.03.2022.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 10-03-2022
Date: 10-03-2022
Business: Adv Mr. M.A. Khan present for plff. and filed affidavit of service in Ch/s No.584/2020.
Adv Saraswati for def No.3 present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of deft No.3 alongwith memorandum of address.
She also field affidavit in reply of deft No.3 in Ch/s No.584/2020.
Copy given to the adv. for the plff.
By cosnet, matter is adjd. for Ch/s hearing to 29.03.2022.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 29-03-2022
Date: 29-03-2022
Business: Court is on Leave
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2022
Date: 17-06-2022
Business: Court is on Leave.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 21-07-2022
Date: 21-07-2022
Business: Adv.Ramesh Madal for plaintiff present.
None pent for deft.
No reply is filed. Chamber summons is proceeded without reply.
Matter adjd to 19.08.2022 for hearing of ch/s.
Next Purpose: C/S HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2022
Date: 19-08-2022
Business: Adv.Ramesh Mandal h/f.Adv.M.A.Khan for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Heard the pltff in ch/s. No.584/20. No argument of defendants.
Matter adjd to 01.10.2022 for ch/s. order.
Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2022
Date: 01-10-2022
Business: None present for both sides.
KB
LO at 04.00 pm
None present for both sides.
F.R.S.R. the following order is passed
ORDER
1. Chamber Summons No.584/2020 is allowed.
2. The plaintiffs are allowed to carry out the amendment as per the scheduled attached with the chamber summons.
3. The plaintiffs are allowed to implead proposed defendant as defendant No.4 to this suit.
4. Amendment shall be carried out within 14 days.
5. After carrying out the amendment the plaintiffs shall served copy of amended plaint on defendant No.1 to 3 and suit summons on defendant No.4.
6. Chamber Summons is disposed of accordingly.
Matter adjd to 03.12.2022 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2022
Date: 03-12-2022
Business: None present for both sides.
Read the order dated 01.10.2022. Read the endorsement about the compliance of carrying out the amendment. Read the plaint title clause. Amendment as to addition of party is not made. Plaintiff is absent for any submission. Plaintiff to take necessary steps.
Matter adj. to 22.02.2023 for compliance/service affidavit of amended plaint/service affidavit of suit summons on added deft.No.4.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2023
Date: 22-02-2023
Business: None present for both sides.
Matter adjd to 08.06.2023 for compliance/service affidavit of amended plaint/service affidavit of suit summons on added deft.No.4.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 08-06-2023
Date: 08-06-2023
Business: Adv. Afnan Husain h/f Adv. Khan for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjd.to 11-07-2023 for compliance of order dtd. 01-10-2022 in passed in CS No. 584/2020.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2023
Date: 11-07-2023
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant
Since none of the parties, nor their counsels are present whenever called out repeatedly and from the perusal of the roznamas it seems that the plaintiff have not carried out proper amendment in the plaint in view of the order dtd. 01-10-2022 passed in C/S No 584/2020, the matter be adjourned for passing order against the plaintiffs on the next date i.e. 06-09-2023.
Matter is adjd.to 06-09-2023 for Order against plaintiff.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2023
Date: 06-09-2023
Business: Adv. Dipti Mehta for plaintiff present and filed application
None for defendant
The Ld. Counsel for plaintiff moved an application seeking further time of one week to carry out amendment in the plaint in terms of the order dtd. 01-10-2022 passed in C/S No. 584/2020. It is stated that due to over sight the plaintiff could not carry out the amendment in the plaint. I dont see any justification to extend further time to carry out the amendment in the plaint which ought to have been carry out within 14 days from the date of the said order. The application would therefor stand refused. From the perusal of the record though the defendants no. 1 to 3 appeared in the suit much earlier, they failed to file their written statement, Hence, suit shall be proceed without WS of defts no. 1 to 3.
Matter is adjd.to 16-10-2023 for R/E by plaintiff
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2023
Date: 16-10-2023
Business: Adv. Khan Maroof for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjd.to 30-10-2023 for R/E
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2023
Date: 30-10-2023
Business: Adv. Parth Vadhan for plaintiff present filed draft C/S with supporting affidavit t.o.r. - O- Leave is granted to register the draft C/S .
None for defendant
Matter is adjd.to 18-12-2023 for R/E
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 18-12-2023
Date: 18-12-2023
Business: Adv. M. A. Khan for plaintiff present.
Adv. for defendant present.
Matter is adjourned to 23-01-2023 for R/E.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 23-01-2024
Date: 23-01-2024
Business: Adv. Dipti Mehta for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjourned to 20-02-2024 for R/E
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 20-02-2024
Date: 20-02-2024
Business: Adv. Afnan Husain for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 04-03-2024 for Steps by plaintiff.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2024
Date: 04-03-2024
Business: Adv. Afnan Hussain for plaintiff present and filed affidavit of service in C/S No. 2189/23 it is taken on record and marked as Exh.A
None for defendant
Matter is adjourned to 29-04-2024 for affidavit of service.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2024
Date: 29-04-2024
Business: Adv. Afnan Husain h/f Adv. M. A. Khan for plaintiff present and filed service affidavit in C/S No. 2189/23 . It is taken on record and marked as Exh. B.
None for defendant.
Plaintiff dosent appear to have serve the defendant the copy of C/S. The plaintiff is directed to serve the defendants with the Ch/s and to file affidavit of service in that regard. From the affidavit of service Exh B it appears that the proposed defendant Saeeda Naziruddin refuse to accept the postal packet containing the copy of Ch/s, when tendered by the postal employee. Hence she is deemed to have been duly serve with the copy of Ch/s. Hence the Ch/s. shall proceed in her absence.
Matter is adjourned to 08-07-2024 for compliance by the plaintiff.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2024
Date: 08-07-2024
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 14-08-2024
Date: 14-08-2024
Business: Adv. Ms. Ayesh Qureshi for the plaintiff is present and filed affidavit of service. It is taken on record and marked as Exh-C.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 30.09.2024 for Compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2024
Date: 30-09-2024
Business: Adv. Afnan Hussain for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 12.11.2024 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2024
Date: 12-11-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 16.01.2025 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2025
Date: 16-01-2025
Business: Adv. Shazad A. Shaikh h/f. Adv. M. A. Khan for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 15-02-2025 for CS argument.
Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2025
Date: 15-02-2025
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 25.02.2025 for CS argument.
Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2025
Date: 25-02-2025
Business: Adv. Siddhesh Bhosale for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 08.04.2025 for CS Argument.
Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2025
Date: 08-04-2025
Business: Adv. Hussain for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 26.06.2025 for CS argument.
Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 26-06-2025
Date: 26-06-2025
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2025
Date: 11-07-2025
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: C/S ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 22-08-2025
Date: 22-08-2025
Business: Adv. Krishna Yadav for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 18.11.2025 for CS hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 18-11-2025
Date: 18-11-2025
Business: COURT IS ON LEAVE.
Next Purpose: C/S HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2025
Date: 15-12-2025
Business: Adv. Krishna Yadav i/b Adv. M. A. Khan for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Order passed in CS 2189/2023
The plaintiff has filed this Chamber summons to add the proposed defendant as defendant no. 4 and his address in the Title Clause of the plaint. The plaintiff had previously filed the Chamber Summons no. 584/2020 to add the proposed defendant no. 4 in the title clause of the plaint. This Chamber Summons was allowed on 01/10/2022. The plaintiff had carried out the amendment in the plaint but he had not filed amended plaint. The plaintiff has again filed this Chamber summons to carryout the amendment as per the order passed in CS no. 584/2020 on 01/10/2022. This is negligence on the part of the plaintiff.
The chamber summons can be allowed by imposing appropriate costs on the plaintiff. Accordingly, i allow the Chamber summons and pass the following orders
ORDER
1. The Chamber Summons no. 2189/2023 is allowed subject to payment of Costs of Rs. 500/- only to the DLSA Mumbai.
2. The payment of cost is condition precedent.
3. The plaintiff to carry out the amendment in the title clause as per the schedule and file amended plaint.
4. The chamber summons is allowed and disposed of.
Matter is adjourned to 02.03.2026 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2026
Date: 02-03-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. A. K. KALE (C.R. NO.63)
Matter pertains to C.R. No.62
Adv. Ujwala Ghodeshwar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Hareshwar Worlikar for defendant No. 2 present and filed Vakalatnama. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.11.
Ld. advocate for defendant No. 2 tendered draft notice of motion alongwith affidavit in support alongwith written statement. O- Leave is granted to register Notice of Motion. Copy of the same is furnished to other side.
Matter is adjourned to 11.03.2026 for tendering registered NM/NM reply.
I/c Judge
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2026
Date: 17-03-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SMT. S. S. NAGUR (C.R. NO.62)
Adv. Krishna Yadav i/b Adv. M. A. Khan for plaintiff present and tendered amended plaint copy. It is taken on record.
Advocate for plaintiff filed application for issuing writ of summons on defendant no. 4. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.D. O- Issue writ of summons to newly added defendant no. 4.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 23.06.2026 for Affidavit of service.
Later on at 12.50 pm
Adv. Manali Dixit for defendant no. 3 present.
Matter is adjourned to 23.06.2026 for Affidavit of service.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2026
Date: 23-06-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SMT. A. K. MANDAVGADE (C.R. NO.62)
None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Kept Back.
Later on at 01.00 pm
None for plaintiff.
Adv. Manali Dixit i/b Adv. Rajkumar Shukla for defendant No. 3 present.
Matter is adjourned to 19.08.2026 for Affidavit of service.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2026
Date: 19-08-2026
Business: CORAM : SMT. B. N. Ichpurani (C.R. NO.63)
Matter pertains to C.R. No.62
Adv. Hamza Shaikh for plaintiff present and filed original writ of summons. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.E.
Adv. Manali Dixit for defendant No. 3 present.
Matter is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for Written Statement.
Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2026