Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

SEEMA GANGADHAR AAROTEVsVASANT BALIRAM CHAWAN

CNR MHCC010002672018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 24th January 2019

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100563/2017
Registration Date
20 Dec 2017

Advocates

0

No advocate information is available in this record.

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 18-01-2018
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  None for Defendant.
Mr. Jain prays for Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC without notice u/o. XXI R. 22 as the Execution is within 2 years of the Decree.  Issue warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC, returnable on 17/04/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2018

Date: 17-04-2018
Business: Parties and Advocate absent.  Adjd to 04/06/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 04-06-2018

Date: 04-06-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present.  On request of Shri Jain adjd to 10/08/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2018

Date: 10-08-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  For return of warrant, adjd to 01/10/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2018

Date: 01-10-2018
Business: Parties and Advocate absent.  Since, Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 05/12/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2018

Date: 05-12-2018
Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 24/01/2019.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2019

Date: 24-01-2019
Business: Shri. Ramesh Jain, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Jain states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 18/01/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 24-01-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100219/2018
Filing Date: 15-12-2017
First Hearing Date: 18th January 2018
Decision Date: 24th January 2019
Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

Orders

0

No order text is available in this record.

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.