EXECUTION APPLN
SEEMA GANGADHAR AAROTEVsMEERA KASHINATH KASABE
CNR MHCC010002652018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 24th January 2019
TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100562/2017
- Registration Date
- 20 Dec 2017
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 18-01-2018 Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Mr. Jain prays for Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 46 and 48 of CPC without notice u/o. XXI R. 22 as the Execution is within 2 years of the Decree. Upon perusing Affidavit praying simultanious attachment u/o. XXI R. 46 and 48, issue warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 46 and 48 of CPC, returnable on 17/04/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2018 Date: 17-04-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjd to 04/06/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 04-06-2018 Date: 04-06-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Shri Jain adjd to 10/08/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2018 Date: 10-08-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. For return of warrant, adjd to 01/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2018 Date: 01-10-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Since, Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 05/12/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2018 Date: 05-12-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 24/01/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2019 Date: 24-01-2019 Business: Shri. Ramesh Jain, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Jain states that as the warrants u/o.XXI Rule 46 and 48 of CPC in the matter have been issued on 18/01/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 24-01-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100218/2018 Filing Date: 15-12-2017 First Hearing Date: 18th January 2018 Decision Date: 24th January 2019 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
