Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 01 Dec 2021 · CNR MHCC010002562020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 Order in NM 93/2020 in Suit 9551/93 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 93 OF 2020 IN SUIT NO. 9551 OF 1993 CNR NO. : :MHCC010002562020 Bhimchhya Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. …. Plaintiffs Versus M/s. F.K. Construction & Ors. ….Defendants Appearance: Adv. Smt. Prachi Khandelwal for plaintiffs. Advs. Shri. Udaya Sankar Samudrala along with Shri. Somnath Pandey for defendant nos. 3,4,6,9,11 &17 to 23. Adv. Smt. Pushpa Thapa for defendant no. 25. CORAM : SMT. S.S. NAGUR, JUDGE, (C.R.NO.04) DATE : 01.12.2021 ORAL ORDER (Dictated in open Court) The plaintiff has filed the Notice of Motion to direct the Court Receiver appointed by order dated 02.08.1995 to visit the building of the plaintiff society. 2. The Notice of Motion is supported by Affidavit of Rajan Kamble, Chairman of the plaintiff no. 1 society. The plaintiff stated that the suit is filed against the defendant no. 1 & 2 for declaration that they have no right, title or interest in respect of building belonging to the ...1/ -- 1 of 5 -- 2 Order in NM 93/2020 in Suit 9551/93 plaintiff society being “A” and “B” wing totally consisting of 25 flats situated at Plot no. 42, Survey No. 111D, Amboli Char Bunglow, near RTO, Andheri (West). The declaration is also sought that the defendant no. 3 to 17 are rank trespassers in respect of flat belonging to the plaintiff society. 3. The plaintiff stated that they filed interim application for appointment of Receiver and other reliefs. The Hon'ble High Court by order dated 02.08.1995 appointed the Court Receiver with a direction to take formal possession of the flat in the building belonging to the plaintiff society and allow the occupants to use the said flats as an agent of the Receiver. The Court Receiver on 30.10.2007 filed report after visiting the building of the plaintiff and verified the occupants. The plaintiff has stated in para 5 about the flats occupied/locked/leave and license/Court Receiver's possession in chart. The suit is for evidence of the plaintiff. However, in view of third parties occupying the flats belonging to the members of the plaintiff society, therefore to ascertain that the occupant do not further transfer their possession to third party to defect the decree, has prayed to give direction to the Receiver to visit the suit property and file report about the actual possession of the said flats. 4. The defendant no. 10 filed reply through Affidavit of Hira Singh for himself and on behalf of defendant no. 3, 4, 6, 9, 11, 17 to 23 and denied the contents of the Notice of Motion stating that the plaintiff is trying to prolong the trial of the suit pending since 2015 for recording evidence of the plaintiff. The Court Receiver was appointed whereby the ...2/ -- 2 of 5 -- 3 Order in NM 93/2020 in Suit 9551/93 Court Receiver was directed to allow the occupants (these defendants) as the agents of the Court Receiver. Hence, prayed to reject the Notice of Motion. 5. Heard Advocate Smt. Prachi Khandelwal for plaintiffs, Advocate Shri. Udaya Sankar Samudrala along with Shri. Somnath Pandey for defendant nos. 3,4,6,9,11 &17 to 23 and Advocate Smt. Pushpa Thapa for defendant no. 25. Perused the contents of the Notice of Motion and reply supported by Affidavit. 6. The plaintiff is seeking direction to be given to the Receiver to verify the occupation of the flats of the suit property so that the plaintiff will be able to bring on record about the possession/occupants of the suit flats. The plaintiff filed Notice of Motion No. 2507 of 1993. The said Notice of Motion was decided on 02.08.1995. The Hon'ble High Court has passed the following order : “In my opinion ends of justice will be served if the Receiver is appointed in respect of the flats in possession of the defendant Nos. 3 to 24 excepting defendant Nos. 5,7,8,15 and 16 and they are appointed as agents of the Receiver in respect of their respective flats in their possession without security and royalty. It is made clear that this order will be subject to the result of the su0it pending in the City Civil Court. Liberty to the plaintiffs to apply for variation of this order after the decision of the pending Motion in the City Civil Court. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. All the defendants waive service of writ of summons and they agree to file their written statement within eight weeks”. 7. The plaintiff has not stated anything about the decision/pendancy of the suits in the City Civil Court. In the above order, there is liberty given to the plaintiff to apply for variation of this order after the decision of the pending Motion in the City Civil Court. ...3/ -- 3 of 5 -- 4 Order in NM 93/2020 in Suit 9551/93 8. The plaintiff instead of proceeding with the suit by filling evidence Affidavit is trying to prolong the dispute by filling the interim applications. The order passed in the Notice of Motion shows that the Receiver is appointed in respect of the flats of the defendant no. 3 to 24 except defendant no. 5, 7, 8, 15 and 16. The occupants of the flats are appointed as agents of the Court Receiver. 9. Considering the above facts on record, I hold that the Notice of Motion is not tenable. It is filed only to prolong the trial of the suit. Hence, pass following order :: ORDER 1) The Notice of Motion is rejected. 2) No order as to costs. 3) Direction is given to the plaintiff to proceed with the suit expeditiously failing which further orders will be passed. 4) Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is disposed of. (SMT.S.S.Nagur) Date :01/12/2021 Judge City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai. Pronounced on : 01.12.2021 Dictated on : 01.12.2021 Typed on : 04.12.2021 Checked & Signed on : 06.12.2021 ...4/ -- 4 of 5 -- 5 Order in NM 93/2020 in Suit 9551/93 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 07/12/2021 11.15 a.m. Prachi Y. Potdar Stenographer – Grade I Name of the Judge HHJ Smt. S.S. Nagur (C.R.NO.4) Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order. 01/12/2021 Judgment/order signed by P.O on 06/12/2021 Judgment/order uploaded on 07/12/2021 ...5/ -- 5 of 5 --
