EXECUTION APPLN
RAJESH PREMJI RATHODVsJAYESH RAMESH MAKWANA
CNR MHCC010002442018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 22nd October 2018
TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100556/2017
- Registration Date
- 20 Dec 2017
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 16-01-2018 Business: Parties and Advocates absent. Adjourned to 06/02/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2018 Date: 06-02-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjourned to 15/02/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2018 Date: 15-02-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Mr. Jain prays for issuance of Warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC without notice u/o. XXI R. 22 as the Execution is within 2 years of the Decree. Hence, issue warrant of Attachment u/o. XXI R. 48 of CPC, returnable on 13/06/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2018 Date: 13-06-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Jain adjd to 16/07/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 16-07-2018 Date: 16-07-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. None for Defendant. On request of Mr. Jain, for return of warrant, adjd to 03/09/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2018 Date: 03-09-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Jain, for return of warrant, adjd to 22/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2018 Date: 22-10-2018 Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Record shows that warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 has already been issued on 15/02/2018. In view of this as the prayer of the Exe.Application is already allowed, the same stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, Warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE Disposal Date: 22-10-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100204/2018 Filing Date: 15-12-2017 First Hearing Date: 16th January 2018 Decision Date: 22nd October 2018 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
