Full Order Text
Interim Order 2 · 22 Mar 2024 · CNR MHCC010002382020
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: SJ No.100023 / 2022, Laxmi - Rachana Order (Exh.13) 1 of 5 City Civil and Sessions Court, Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai Court Room No. 31 – Commercial Court (Additional District Judge : Vijay S. Hingne, LL. M.) MHCC010002382020 SJ Filed : 12.10.2022 Arguments Heard : 22.02.2024 Decided on : 22.03.2024 Duration : 1 Y, 5 M, 11 Days Exhibit No.13 Summary Judgment No. 100023 / 2022 in Commercial Suit No. 100375 / 2020 Plaintiff : Laxmi Interchem VERSUS Defendant : Rachana Chemicals Appearances Plaintiff : Adv. Ms. Geeta Gyanchandlala Defendant : Adv. Ms. Purva Lamba Summary Judgment **************************************************** ORDER (Pronounced on this 22nd Day of March 2024) Plaintiff has preferred Summary Judgment. -- 1 of 5 -- SJ No.100023 / 2022, Laxmi - Rachana Order (Exh.13) 2 of 5 Points for determination : 2) Perused record. Heard the Learned Counsels. Points for determination, findings and reasons : Points Findings 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled for Summary Judgment?.................... In the Negative. 2. What Order? …………………… As per final order. R E A S O N S Case of plaintiff : 3) Plaintiff Laxmi Interchem, is Sole Proprietorship Firm of Mr. Darshak Shah, carrying on business of chemicals (hereinafter, Plaintiff). Defendant Rachana Chemicals is Partnership Firm (hereinafter, defendant). 4) Defendant had placed two Purchase Orders of Fully Refined Paraffin Wax (hereinafter, goods), as follows : Sr. Order No. Date Kgs. Amount 1 03 / 18-19 10.04.2018 2550 2,79,838/- 2 03 / 18-19 10.04.2018 2850 3,12,760/- Accordingly, plaintiff supplied goods of . ₹ 5,92,598/-. Defendant received said goods at its Taloja factory. 5) Towards repayment, defendant issued Post-dated Cheques and requested plaintiff not to deposit the same. Despite requests by e-mails, telephone, defendant failed to make payment. Hence, on 21.05.2019, plaintiff issued recovery-notice and the preferred present Commercial Suit No. 100375 / 2020, for recovery of . ₹ 8,13,639.72/-, with interest @ 36 % p. a. Written Statement (Exh.7, Dt. 08.12.2021) : 6) Defendant opposed the Suit on numerous grounds and prayed for its dismissal on exemplary costs. -- 2 of 5 -- SJ No.100023 / 2022, Laxmi - Rachana Order (Exh.13) 3 of 5 Issues : 7) Considering rival pleadings, my Learned Predecessor, on 25.08.2022, framed Issues at Exh. 9 and adjourned the Suit for arguments on Case Management Hearing on 12.10.2022. Summary Judgment No. 100023 / 2022 (Dt. 12.10.2022) : 8) Plaintiff has provided goods worth . ₹ 5,92,598/- to defendant. Defendant has accepted said goods without grievance about quality. Defendant has also issued Post-dated Cheques, which signify their admission against outstanding amount. Plaintiff has filed all relevant documents relating to transaction. Against it, defendant do not have any substantial defense. Therefore, before recording of oral evidence, plaintiff be made entitled for decree under Order 13-A. Reply by defendant (Exh.11) : 9) Defendant opposed Summary Judgment on grounds as : 1. Defendant has paid amount against Order Dt. 15.07.2017, 20.03.2018 and 10.04.2018. 2. Defendant had placed order of goods manufactured by Fushun Petro Chemical Company. However, plaintiff supplied said goods manufactured by Petro China Company Limited. As both raw materials have same physical appearance, defendant did not noticed change of manufacturer. Thereby, plaintiff misused trust and deliberately supplied faulty goods against Orders Dt. 10.04.2018 and 18.04.2018. Defendant subjected said goods to final product. When final product was supplied by defendant, its buyer returned consignment for reasons of faulty final goods. Said defect arose because of defective goods / raw material of plaintiff. It caused loss to defendant. 3. Suit is not maintainable even under Order 13-A. Hence, Summary Judgment be dismissed with exemplary cost. -- 3 of 5 -- SJ No.100023 / 2022, Laxmi - Rachana Order (Exh.13) 4 of 5 Reasons as to Point No. 1 to No. 2 : 10) All points being interconnected, are taken for common discussion. 11) Plaintiff has preferred the Summary Judgment under Order 13-A. Said provision is specifically applicable to Commercial disputes. Order 13-A, Rule 2 reads as follows : 2. Stage for application for summary judgment. An applicant may apply for summary judgment at any time after summons has been served on the defendant: Provided that, no application for summary judgment may be made by such applicant after the Court has framed the issues in respect of the suit. Thus, Order 13-A Rule 2 mandates that, applicant may apply for Summary Judgment, but, after summons is served on the defendant and before the Court has framed the Issues in respect of the Suit. 12) In present Suit, my Learned Predecessor has framed the issues on 25.08.2022 (Exh.9). Roznama shows that, it is thereafter on 12.10.2022, the plaintiff tendered application for Summary Judgment. As per Order 13-A, Rule 2, plaintiff was having right to file application for Summary Judgment on or before 25.08.2022. Having failed to do so, provision of Order 13-A Rule 2 prevents the plaintiff from filing any such application after 25.08.2022. Said application being filed on 12.10.2022, cannot be considered at this stage. Therefore, the Point No. 1 is answered in Negative. Consequently, Summary Judgment is disposed off, by following Order : ORDER 1. Summary Judgment No. 100023 / 2022, is rejected. 2. In view of Issues framed on 25.08.2022 at Exh.9, the Suit is adjourned for Case Management Hearing. -- 4 of 5 -- SJ No.100023 / 2022, Laxmi - Rachana Order (Exh.13) 5 of 5 3. Proceeding of Summary Judgment No. 100023 / 2022, is closed. 4. Order dictated and pronounced in Open Court. 5. Parties be informed about their right to challenge this Order and limitation for same. 6. Record of Summary Judgment shall be part of Commercial Suit No. 100375 / 2020. Mumbai Dated : 22.03.2024 (Vijay S. Hingne) Additional District Judge, Court Room No.31 - Commercial Court, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS -- 5 of 5 --
