Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 09 Jan 2018 · CNR MHCC010002202018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: N/M 80/18 in Su 1693/15 1/2 Date : 9.1.2018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, AT MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO.80/2018 IN SUIT NO.1693/2015 Smt. Usha Shahaji Mane ]... Plaintiff V/s. Smt. Swati Dayanand Mane ]… Defendant Adv. Sandeep Katke for plaintiff. Adv. Shailesh Prabhu for defendant. CORAM : HHJ Shri G. R. Agrawal C. R. No.03 DATE : 9.1.2018 ORDER (Dictated in open court) 1. By the present notice of motion, the plaintiff is praying for temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from creating third party interest in the suit premises and from disturbing the plaintiff from enjoyment of the suit premises. The defendant has filed reply to the motion. 2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 3. It is case of plaintiff that the suit property is tenanted premises and fatherinlaw of the plaintiff and defendant was the original tenant. The documents filed by plaintiff such as Electricity bill and death certificate of her husband show that husband of plaintiff was residing in the suit premises. In the cause title of the plaint, the residential address of the plaintiff and defendant is shown as same i.e. Room no.1 of Kisan Koli Chawl, Dharavi, Mumbai. The plaintiff has pleaded in -- 1 of 3 -- N/M 80/18 in Su 1693/15 2/2 Date : 9.1.2018 paragraph no.10 of plaint that she is working in Indian Railways and because of the employment she is required to move from place to place. It is also pleaded in paragraph no.11 that the relationship between plaintiff and defendant is strained and there are frequent quarrels. 4. There is no primafacie material on record to show that the plaintiff is residing in the suit premises at present. Hence, the question to restrain defendant from obstructing the enjoyment of plaintiff over the suit premises does not arise. 5. As regards the prayer for injunction from creating third party interest, the plaintiff is claiming partition in the suit premises and it is her case that she has ½ share in the suit premises. Hence, it will be necessary to protect the interest of the plaintiff by directing the defendant not to create the third party interest in suit premises during the pendency of the suit. Hence, following order. ORDER 1. N/M no.80/2018 is partly allowed. 2. The defendant is temporarily restrained from creating third party interest in suit premises, during pendency of suit. 3. Notice of motion is disposed of. (G. R. Agrawal) Judge City Civil Court, Date : 9.1.2018 Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 9.1.2018 Typed on : 12.1.2018 Signed on : 12.1.2018 “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 12.1.2018 at 5.35 pm (Mrs. S. W. Tuscano) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER -- 2 of 3 -- N/M 80/18 in Su 1693/15 3/2 Date : 9.1.2018 Name of the Judge (with Court room no.) HHJ Shri G. R. Agrawal, C.R. No.3 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 9.1.2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 12.1.2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 12.1.2018 -- 3 of 3 --
