Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Haiderali Taher RassiwallaVsMHADA And Anr

CNR MHCC01000195201912-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 14th November 2019

TrustJury record updated 16 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100083/2019
Registration Date
05 Jan 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 12-02-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-03-2019

Date: 13-03-2019
Business: Court is on leave
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2019

Date: 12-06-2019
Business: Adjd
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2019

Date: 18-09-2019
Business: Plaintiff present.
Adv. Ms. Mangal Kadam for Defendant-1 and 2 present.
Original registered N/M No.83/19 alongwith affidavit in support tendered by Defendant nos. 1 and 2. t.o.r.
Matter is adjd. to 13.11.2019 for reply to N/M by the Plaintiff.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2019

Date: 13-11-2019
Business: Adv.Parmar for plaintiff present, he submitted that he did not want to submit reply to the NM taken out by defendant No.1 and 2
Adv.Ms.Chandramore for BMC/deft/No.3 and 4 Present.
Adv.Mangal Kadam for defendant 1 and 2 present.
Heard argument of advocate of plaintiff and defendants.
Matter adj for Order on 14.11.2019
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2019

Date: 14-11-2019
Business: Adv.Satamkar h/f Adv.Mangal Kadam for MHADA/defendant Present.
Order below NM No.83/19
None present for plaintiff and defendant. NM No.83/19 is taken out by defendant No.1 and 2 for condonation of delay of 73 days  in filing written statement. On ealier date Ld. Advocate of plaintiff submitted that he do not wish to file reply on Notice of Motion. Therefore, arguments of both the Ld. Advocates were heard. In the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, it is submitted that the copy of plaint was served on defendant No. 1 and 2 on 30.08.2011. After appearance in the matter, the instructions were called from the office. However, the copy of the plaint got misplaced from the concerned officer, and therefore delay in fiing the written statement has been caused. Ld. Advocate for plaintiff has not opposed of the Notice of Motion. Therefore, if the prayers in the Notice of Motion are allowed, no prejudice or harm will cause to plaintiff. Further more, if the written statement of defendant No.1 and 2 is taken on record, it will helpful in deciding the suit on its own merit. In the result, Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The written statement of defendant No1 already tendered be taken on record. NM No.83/19 is disposed of accordingly.
W/S of defendant No.1
Matter adj for framing of issues to 20.01.2019.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 14-11-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 100255/2019
Filing Date: 05-01-2019
First Hearing Date: 12th February 2019
Decision Date: 14th November 2019
Court Number And Judge: 12-COURT 12  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
14 Nov 2019

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 Notice of Motion No.83/19 in Suit No.2269/2018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY Notice of Motion No. 83 of 2019 (CNR NO. MH CC010001952019) In SUIT No. 2269 OF 2018 Haidarali Taher Rassiwalla & Ors. ....Plaintiffs V/s. Mumbai Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) and ors. ....Defendants Appearance: Mr. Parmar, Advocate for the plaintiff. Mrs. Mangal Kadam, Advocate for the defendant Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE JAYSHRI…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.